Is a belief in rebirth necessary for practice?

[Spiny Norman]

Is a belief in rebirth necessary for effective practice of the 8-fold path? I don't see that it is but would be interested in your views.

P

[retrofuturist]

Greetings Porpoise,

So long as practice of the Noble Eightfold Path is done with a view to improving the present and the future, I don't see how it matters quite how that future is categorized or compartmentalized in our minds.

We cannot see through time and see the causes of suffering in the future. We can only see them once they are present.

Metta,
Retro.

[PeterB]

I think that there is more than one way to be dishonest porpoise, and one way is to have an emotional response to a particular teaching because it satisfies some emotional need , to see the world as " fair " for example..and then to make that emotional need the driving force in our practice of the Buddhadhamma...and to suggest that those who do not have that particular need or who have resolved it to some degree must be deficient.
The only thing that we need for practice imo is a recognition that we are suffering here and now, and to see that the Buddha offered a way out of that suffering. Anything else is icing on the cake.

[Spiny Norman]

We cannot see through time and see the causes of suffering in the future. We can only see them once they are present.

Very true. I don't know what will happen next week, let alone in a possible future lifetime.

P

[Spiny Norman]

I think that there is more than one way to be dishonest porpoise, and one way is to have an emotional response to a particular teaching because it satisfies some emotional need....

I'm sorry but you've lost me here. Does this belong in another thread?

P

[PeterB]

No. Just because my reply is not obvious to you doesn't mean that it is not addressing the issue that you raised.
I am saying that frequently a belief or disbelief in rebirth is nothing to do with whether it is necessary to hold a particular position in order to practice successfully.
Its about an emotional need to believe or disbelieve..in whatever.

[Spiny Norman]

Its about an emotional need to believe or disbelieve..in whatever.

Yes, I'd agree with that. It's the reason we get attached to our views, and the reason these debates can get so heated. It's another reason for practising mindfulness I guess.

P

[PeterB]

In my own case I frequently find so porpoise...

[fabianfred]

I would say that karma and rebirth are inextricaly intertwined and hence it is hardly possible to elieve in one without the other.
Understanding that the law of karma is real is surely one of the requirements before attaining to Sotapanna..??
Certainly for myself an understanding that the Buddha practiced the perfections for countless billions of aeons as a Boddhisatva in order to reach buddhahood and bring the truth to many beings, gives me great respect for him, and every Buddha.

[PeterB]

I respect that this is your view fabianfred. It is a topic that is aired frequently on this forum as you will discover...and you will find that there are a number of views on the subject.
It might save you time if I suggest that you google the thoughts of Ajahn Buddhadasa on this subject, and also the ideas of Stephen Batchelor.
You may of course disagree with both of them, but they have influenced directly or indirectly many of the members of this forum.
Being acquainted with their thought, if you are not already, will give you a clearer idea where a proportion of members are coming from.

[dhamma_spoon]

I would say that karma and rebirth are inextricaly intertwined and hence it is hardly possible to elieve in one without the other.
Understanding that the law of karma is real is surely one of the requirements before attaining to Sotapanna..??
Certainly for myself an understanding that the Buddha practiced the perfections for countless billions of aeons as a Boddhisatva in order to reach buddhahood and bring the truth to many beings, gives me great respect for him, and every Buddha.

Hello, Fabianfred -

I read your post with friendly appreciation, and reflected upon your very positive attitude.
I think I see a strong saddha (conviction) in the Buddha and his Teachings radiating from it!
In my humble & sincere opinion there is no way a well-instructed Buddhist can develop full understanding of kamma and patisandhi(rebirth-linking) if he or she is not endowed with the Dependent-Origination perspective that spans over the three time periods : past, future, and present.

Tep
----

[adeh]

It seems that the Buddha himself had no problem with the idea of rebirth. From the Samannaphala Sutta (DN 2):

Recollection of Past Lives

"With his mind thus concentrated, purified, and bright, unblemished, free from defects, pliant, malleable, steady, and attained to imperturbability, he directs and inclines it to knowledge of the recollection of past lives (lit: previous homes). He recollects his manifold past lives, i.e., one birth, two births, three births, four, five, ten, twenty, thirty, forty, fifty, one hundred, one thousand, one hundred thousand, many aeons of cosmic contraction, many aeons of cosmic expansion, many aeons of cosmic contraction and expansion, [recollecting], 'There I had such a name, belonged to such a clan, had such an appearance. Such was my food, such my experience of pleasure and pain, such the end of my life. Passing away from that state, I re-arose there. There too I had such a name, belonged to such a clan, had such an appearance. Such was my food, such my experience of pleasure and pain, such the end of my life. Passing away from that state, I re-arose here.' Thus he recollects his manifold past lives in their modes and details. Just as if a man were to go from his home village to another village, and then from that village to yet another village, and then from that village back to his home village. The thought would occur to him, 'I went from my home village to that village over there. There I stood in such a way, sat in such a way, talked in such a way, and remained silent in such a way. From that village I went to that village over there, and there I stood in such a way, sat in such a way, talked in such a way, and remained silent in such a way. From that village I came back home.' In the same way — with his mind thus concentrated, purified, and bright, unblemished, free from defects, pliant, malleable, steady, and attained to imperturbability — the monk directs and inclines it to knowledge of the recollection of past lives. He recollects his manifold past lives... in their modes and details.

"This, too, great king, is a fruit of the contemplative life, visible here and now, more excellent than the previous ones and more sublime.

[Dhammakid]

Adeh:
Is "previous homes" the same as "past lives?" Do they have the same definition? (Edited)

Edit (to keep with the main topic): In my experience, belief or non-belief in rebirth is not absolutely necessary for practice, since all phenomena can only be experienced in the present moment, and can only be remembered in the present moment. If a future life occurs, it's experienced in the present moment. If a past life occured, it was experienced in the present moment of that time. A previous life is recollected in the present moment.

I myself believe in literal rebirth, but I have never had a personal experience of such. I take it on faith and suttas.


Dhammakid

[adeh]

That would seem to be a logical conclusion......I doubt that remembering every house you've lived in in this lifetime could be considered a fruit of the ascetic life.....

[Dhammakid]

That would seem to be a logical conclusion......I doubt that remembering every house you've lived in in this lifetime could be considered a fruit of the ascetic life.....

Hahaha, right right...

Let me clarify. Judging from the many discussions on rebirth on this board, I've learned that people have many different interpretations of particular phrases and terms in suttas. So I was just wondering if "previous homes" had a different meaning than "past lives." That's all.


Dhammakid