Sobeh, my dear, do you really trust offical studies?
You have to be cautious with them. Plus, they often get reversed after a while.
They are usually worded very carefully, so that an average reader overlooks things and feels safe:
From link 1: unlikely
-what does that tell the alert reader? Uncertainty.
several studies underway
Several studies are under way to determine whether the results of some studies on animals have any relevance to cancer in human beings.
means: we don't know enough yet. If we did, we didn't need more studies.
to determine whether the results of some studies in animals have any relevance to cancer in human beings.
So that means, animal tests had increased cancer rates.
no convincing evidence
So, there is
some evidence. But we say it is not "convincing".
Convinving would be: ~ 50% of all cellphone users got gliobastoma after 2 year of using a cellphone.
15 % after 3 years is not convincing. (Exxaggered example).
If you, Sobeh, have a close relationship with your handy and want to believe it is safe, and therefore wish to believe those studies, who am I to talk you out of it?
You gotta know your comfortable zone, and I mine. I prefer a natural scepticism of the results others, because I don't trust their intellligence. Human horizons can be utterly limited despite university degrees.
I have come to the conclusion that official studies are often trivializing matters until get refuted by newer studies which come to more alerting results. Some things are not desired and so taken as 'unlikely'. Must have another reason. Got so used to my cellphone, it must be ok. it has to be.
That is just the way this world goes.
Did you ever ask yourself which results official studies about kamma and rebirth would show
? " There is not enough evidence to...."