I should have said "remove all critical thought" as in thinking about what your doing instead of experiencing it
As for perfections i simply meant to have developed it as a strong foundation
I agree that it is not as easy as it often sounds when we learn about it. Access concentration is probably difficult for most people to enter into and maintain prior to sufficient experience of clearly entering into it. I think this is because attention is not sufficiently paid to the hindrances. When I noticed this opposing nature of the hindrances I made attending to and overcoming the hindrances my top priority and this made a huge difference to my overall facility for entering into a steady access concentration. I don't know why the hindrances get so little attention but I think that they should get a lot more attention. When you focus on the arising, persisting and disappearance of the hindrances you develop insight and concentration together in a very useful way which can then be further applied during access concentration and both qualities can be further refined in the same kind of mutually supportive way.mikenz66 wrote:Hi Nathan,
Where I've seen it presented (e.g. in Bhante Sujiva's book, or by other teachers) it is considered reasonably "advanced", I think.
My experience is that if I have built up enough mindfulness and concentration (after several days of retreat), then I can sometimes just sit and watch whatever is going past (without any "primary object", in the Mahasi sense, to anchor the attention). However, I notice a danger that if mindfulness is not strong enough I drift off into a rather unhelpful state...
Metta
Mike
nathan wrote:I agree that it is not as easy as it often sounds when we learn about it. Access concentration is probably difficult for most people to enter into and maintain prior to sufficient experience of clearly entering into it. I think this is because attention is not sufficiently paid to the hindrances.
...
nathan wrote: When you focus on the arising, persisting and disappearance of the hindrances you develop insight and concentration together in a very useful way which can then be further applied during access concentration and both qualities can be further refined in the same kind of mutually supportive way.
While I have been mentioning at every opportunity lately that I think the hindrances should receive more considered attention all around I am not suggesting that the subject hasn't already been well treated. I suspect that we all overlook the significance of the hindrances for a while for what are later seen retrospectively as pretty obvious reasons. The hindrances will continue to arise for all of us and force the issue. So, no worries.mikenz66 wrote:Hi Nathan,nathan wrote:I agree that it is not as easy as it often sounds when we learn about it. Access concentration is probably difficult for most people to enter into and maintain prior to sufficient experience of clearly entering into it. I think this is because attention is not sufficiently paid to the hindrances.
...
You may be right. I was going to say that I have read hundreds of pages and listened to dozens of talks on the hindrances (oops, I already said it...) but perhaps I have not taken on board this point enough.nathan wrote: When you focus on the arising, persisting and disappearance of the hindrances you develop insight and concentration together in a very useful way which can then be further applied during access concentration and both qualities can be further refined in the same kind of mutually supportive way.
From where I am you're talking about taking the hindrances themselves as the object. I do, of course, do this to a certain extent, focussing on desire, aversion, sloth, etc, but perhaps I'm not paying enough interested attention to them...
Metta
Mike
Users browsing this forum: heromuseum, kiwi, Lazy_eye and 12 guests