lojong1 wrote:Why have you--yes, you--translated punabbhava into rebirth?
lojong1 wrote:Why have you--yes, you--translated punabbhava into rebirth?
'Rebirth' is already extremely busy hiding a host of other refugee definitions from various languages and traditions.
Paticca-samuppada says that birth (jaati) and becoming (bhaava) are not the same. Punabbhava is 'again-becoming.' If 'again-becoming' is unwieldy, why not use punabbhava? It has buddhist origins (unlike rebirth) and cannot yet be confused with any other word or context.
Why have you translated jaati...why upapajjati...etc...
..."X" as 'rebirth'?
Seeing the confusion in other buddhist rebirth threads, why don't we just stop using the word 'rebirth'?
If consciousness were not to descend into the mother's womb, would name-and-form take shape in the womb?"
"No, lord."
"If, after descending into the womb, consciousness were to depart, would name-and-form be produced for this world?"
"No, lord."
"If the consciousness of the young boy or girl were to be cut off, would name-and-form ripen, grow, and reach maturity?"
"No, lord."
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html
Sunrise wrote:DN15 is probably the only place where a womb is referred to in the pali out of the suttas that DO is talked about. I would seriously doubt its credibility not only because the DN is anyway believed to be a later addition by some but also because it is drastically different to the other suttas that talks about paticcasamuppada. It looks a lot like a later addition.

mikenz66 wrote:Sunrise wrote:DN15 is probably the only place where a womb is referred to in the pali out of the suttas that DO is talked about. I would seriously doubt its credibility not only because the DN is anyway believed to be a later addition by some but also because it is drastically different to the other suttas that talks about paticcasamuppada. It looks a lot like a later addition.
This may be true, but it seems implied in many other places and specific mention of old age, sickness and death is common...
And DO is not the only time there is talk about birth. Plenty of wombs elsewhere in the Suttas.
Mke

Alex123 wrote:
If there will be no continuation after this miserable life
Sunrise wrote:Alex123 wrote:
If there will be no continuation after this miserable life
Why is life miserable?
Edible Food:
Simile: A couple, foodless in the midst of a desert, eat their little child, to enable them to reach their destination.
Sense-impression (contact):
Simile: A skinned cow, wherever s/he stands, will be ceaselessly attacked by the insects and other creatures living in the vicinity.
Volitional thought: Simile: two strong men dragging a victim into a fire pit
Consciousness:
simile: a punishment of a criminal who thrice daily is pierced with hundred spears (total 300 per day) and yet is alive to experience the suffering.
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/auth ... html#intro
Alex123 wrote:Sunrise wrote:Alex123 wrote:
If there will be no continuation after this miserable life
Why is life miserable?
Because it is its nature. It is natural.
It is fully conditioned and out of Self control. It is bondage. Even the most exulted states of consciousness are still not as good and peaceful as total and permanent absence of it. Famous and infamous people suffer in their own way. Good events don't last and we don't have control to prevent bad ones from happening.
retrofuturist wrote:Greetings lojong1,lojong1 wrote:Why have you--yes, you--translated punabbhava into rebirth?
it's probably best to move this topic out of the Mahavihara group of sub-forums, so hold onto your seats which we move somewhere else...
Metta,
Retro.
Alex123 wrote:
DN15 sutta on entering the womb part.If consciousness were not to descend into the mother's womb, would name-and-form take shape in the womb?"
"No, lord."
"If, after descending into the womb, consciousness were to depart, would name-and-form be produced for this world?"
"No, lord."
"If the consciousness of the young boy or girl were to be cut off, would name-and-form ripen, grow, and reach maturity?"
"No, lord."
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html
Sunrise wrote:DN15 is probably the only place where a womb is referred to in the pali out of the suttas that DO is talked about. I would seriously doubt its credibility not only because the DN is anyway believed to be a later addition by some but also because it is drastically different to the other suttas that talks about paticcasamuppada. It looks a lot like a later addition.

Alex123 wrote:Because it is its nature. It is natural.
It is fully conditioned and out of Self control. It is bondage. Even the most exulted states of consciousness are still not as good and peaceful as total and permanent absence of it. Famous and infamous people suffer in their own way. Good events don't last and we don't have control to prevent bad ones from happening.
...he gives up all latent tendencies to greed, drives out all latent tendencies to aversion, and completely destroying the latent tendency to measure as `I be', dispels ignorance, arouses science, and here and now makes an end of unpleasantness.
MN 9
Sunrise wrote:I am not talking about old age, sickness and death in different contexts. I am talking about the womb in the context of dependent origination.
mikenz66 wrote:this thread is not just about DO, but about rebirth in general

Return to General Theravāda discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests