Science-Earthquake

A forum for beginners and members of other Buddhist traditions to ask questions about Theravāda (The Way of the Elders). Responses require moderator approval before they are visible in order to double-check alignment to Theravāda orthodoxy.
Sanghamitta
Posts: 1614
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:21 am
Location: By the River Thames near London.

Re: Science-Earthquake

Post by Sanghamitta »

I am not at all sure that I know how to disambiguate...
But I think it means dont look to the Suttas for an explanation of the phenomenological universe which corresponds at all points to that of science.
Its not the job of the Suttas.
Of course if we see the Suttas as DivInely Inspired Scriptures...this could be problem . But if we dont, If we see them as a bit of an old mishmash of carefully recorded utterances of the Buddha , prevailing myth, and later additions.... then safely through the thickets of ambiguity we go.
The going for refuge is the door of entrance to the teachings of the Buddha.

Bhikku Bodhi.
Shonin
Posts: 583
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 5:11 am

Re: Science-Earthquake

Post by Shonin »

Quite
lojong1
Posts: 607
Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2009 2:59 am

Re: Science-Earthquake

Post by lojong1 »

Sanghamitta wrote:But I think it means dont look to the Suttas for an explanation of the phenomenological universe which corresponds at all points to that of science.
Its not the job of the Suttas.
Rahula80 hasn't disagreed with this so I guess it's what he meant.
I'm looking to the suttas to see what is in the suttas, no more no less. Knowing that the Pali vocabulary would have been extremely limited in this field; seeing the various translations and how easily they are interpreted with entirely Western connotation; not knowing the translators' competence in seismology and related fields, not to mention my own ignorance -- for these reasons I'm not ready to say this earthquake bit contradicts current scientific findings--and much less willing to say it will always appear wrong.

"Gravitational wave is a concept of Einstein's General Theory of Relativity given in 1916. According to the theory, accelerating mass should radiate gravitational waves as accelerating charges radiate radio waves. Gravitational wave is a deformation of space-time. An object exposed to gravitational waves should become alternatively longer and thinner, shorter and broader. The variation however so small (10-17 in dimensionless) that it does not yet possible to detect. Several direct detectors of gravitational are being built in USA. The best known of these are Laser Interferometer Ground Observatory (LIGO) and Laser Interferometer Space Array (LISA). In Bangladesh, theoretical research on pulsar, gravitational waves and earthquake prediction from space are being done at the Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences of BRAC University." http://www.thedailystar.net/newDesign/n ... nid=155247" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

"We have computed perturbations in the nighttime mid-latitude F2 region ionosphere that could be produced by internal atmospheric gravity waves generated before strong earthquakes through ionospheric Joule heating due to the seismogenic electric field of short duration. There is a strong anisotropy of the atmospheric gravity wave effect with respect to the imminent earthquake epicentre, the electron density changes being maximum poleward and equatorward of the epicentre and being minimum eastward and westward of it. It should be noted that the duration of the electron density perturbation in the F2 region ionosphere is much longer than the duration of the primary precursor of an earthquake – the enhancement of the vertical electric field at the Earth’s surface, which initiates the atmospheric gravity wave generation. This fact is important from the practical point of view of predicting catastrophic earthquakes." http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_o ... archtype=a" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elchin_Khalilov" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Gravitational Waves and Geodynamics by Khalilov (in Russian) http://book-ias-he.org/Qravitatsionnie_ ... namika.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.khalilov.biz/pdf/About%20pos ... es%203.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
Sherab
Posts: 239
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 3:53 am

Re: Science-Earthquake

Post by Sherab »

lojong1 wrote:I'm looking to the suttas to see what is in the suttas, no more no less. Knowing that the Pali vocabulary would have been extremely limited in this field; seeing the various translations and how easily they are interpreted with entirely Western connotation; not knowing the translators' competence in seismology and related fields, not to mention my own ignorance -- for these reasons I'm not ready to say this earthquake bit contradicts current scientific findings--and much less willing to say it will always appear wrong.
Make sense to me. In addition, I agree that we should not look to the suttas for "explanation of the phenomenological universe" as that is not the objective of the suttas and as whatever was stated in the suttas would conform with the extant knowledge.
lojong1 wrote:"Gravitational wave is a concept of Einstein's General Theory of Relativity given in 1916. According to the theory, accelerating mass should radiate gravitational waves as accelerating charges radiate radio waves. Gravitational wave is a deformation of space-time. An object exposed to gravitational waves should become alternatively longer and thinner, shorter and broader. The variation however so small (10-17 in dimensionless) that it does not yet possible to detect. Several direct detectors of gravitational are being built in USA. The best known of these are Laser Interferometer Ground Observatory (LIGO) and Laser Interferometer Space Array (LISA). In Bangladesh, theoretical research on pulsar, gravitational waves and earthquake prediction from space are being done at the Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences of BRAC University." http://www.thedailystar.net/newDesign/n ... nid=155247" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Since the effect of gravitational wave is hard to detect, I would think that extraterrestial gravitational waves would hardly have any impact on terrestial seismic activity.
lojong1 wrote:"We have computed perturbations in the nighttime mid-latitude F2 region ionosphere that could be produced by internal atmospheric gravity waves generated before strong earthquakes through ionospheric Joule heating due to the seismogenic electric field of short duration. There is a strong anisotropy of the atmospheric gravity wave effect with respect to the imminent earthquake epicentre, the electron density changes being maximum poleward and equatorward of the epicentre and being minimum eastward and westward of it. It should be noted that the duration of the electron density perturbation in the F2 region ionosphere is much longer than the duration of the primary precursor of an earthquake – the enhancement of the vertical electric field at the Earth’s surface, which initiates the atmospheric gravity wave generation. This fact is important from the practical point of view of predicting catastrophic earthquakes." http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_o ... archtype=a" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
This looks more like a description of the effect of changes in terrestial gravitational field from seismic activity of the earth itself.
lojong1 wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elchin_Khalilov
Gravitational Waves and Geodynamics by Khalilov (in Russian) http://book-ias-he.org/Qravitatsionnie_ ... namika.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.khalilov.biz/pdf/About%20pos ... es%203.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
This probably has the closest correspondence to the suttic description of a cause of earthquake.
lojong1
Posts: 607
Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2009 2:59 am

Re: Science-Earthquake

Post by lojong1 »

"mahāpathavī udake patiṭṭhitā, udakaṃ vāte patiṭṭhitaṃ, vāto ākāsaṭṭho"
(Rhetorical) What does it mean to be "patiṭṭhitā"?
Paul Heckert: "Earth and Solid Planets Were Once Liquid.
"Surface tension will pull liquids and gasses into a spherical shape but not solids. The fact that Earth, Moon, Mercury, Venus, Mars and the larger moons of Jupiter or Saturn are all spherical tells astronomers that they were once liquid. These worlds are all solid now, but were liquid when they first formed. The smaller moons of Jupiter or Saturn, and asteroids are not spherical because they were never liquid." http://www.suite101.com/content/why-are ... nd-a189153" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
beeblebrox
Posts: 939
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 10:41 pm

Re: Science-Earthquake

Post by beeblebrox »

lojong1 wrote:[ . . . ] Knowing that the Pali vocabulary would have been extremely limited in this field; seeing the various translations and how easily they are interpreted with entirely Western connotation; not knowing the translators' competence in seismology and related fields, not to mention my own ignorance -- for these reasons I'm not ready to say this earthquake bit contradicts current scientific findings--and much less willing to say it will always appear wrong.
Very good points, lojong.
"Gravitational wave is a concept of Einstein's General Theory of Relativity given in 1916. According to the theory, accelerating mass should radiate gravitational waves as accelerating charges radiate radio waves.
2,500 years from now the science will likely to be replaced by something entirely different... a system that is far more advanced, and much better according to the views of future beings who created it.

These future beings, (some of them highly respected practitioners within their own new field), will probably try to puzzle out why Einstein would claim that one's own family members are integral parts of Physics. This is their interpretation of the term "relativity".

It's based on the very few literatures that they still have available. These books are written in a bunch of obscure languages called "English", "German", etc. They'll also wonder why it seemed like so many people thought that his idea of relativity was brilliant.

They'll accuse Einstein of claiming that the gravity originated from oceans (along with the radio frequencies). This is their interpretation of the "waves". Kinda similar to how some people right now are puzzling out why the Buddha said that the liquids, fire, and "atmosphere" were what caused the earthquakes.

These future beings will not realize just how far away removed their own interpretations are from Einstein's own language. They will not notice just how completely wound up their own minds really are, within their own advanced, different ways of viewing things.

There will be absolutely no understanding of anything that Einstein said, just as long as these future beings' minds remain unliberated, from their own system....

I guess it's a good thing that this is exactly the sort of thing that the Buddha's Dhamma is for. (That is... if it's still around 2,500 years from now.)
Mawkish1983
Posts: 1285
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:46 am
Location: Essex, UK

Re: Science-Earthquake

Post by Mawkish1983 »

Incidentally, it's a common misconception that the plates float on a liquid. The magma in the mantle is 95-99% solid.

We've been looking at misconceptions on the teacher training course and this one in particular came up. Text books were shown to contain at least one error per page on average on the subject of Earth sciences.

And yet most of the world is happy with the misconception. It works for them. Media (films like 'The Core') help cement the misconceptions. Fact is, the mantle transmits S-waves, so is mostly solid.

On an unrelated note, about 20% of children in the UK leave school believing in the continuum matter theory, rejecting the particle matter theory,

Just thought I'd share.
SamKR
Posts: 1037
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 4:33 pm

Re: Science-Earthquake

Post by SamKR »

Sherab wrote:
retrofuturist wrote: The Buddha was explaining this in accord with cosmology as it was understood at the time.

Whether he did know, or could have known otherwise, are rather speculative and ultimately unrewarding questions, that are neither connected with dukkha nor its cessation.
Having a science background, seeing such passages in the suttas IS dukkha to me. :tantrum:
One of the four unthinkables (said to be declared by the Buddha): Thinking about the range of a Buddha's understanding.
Period.

He was so clever, he must have guessed that people will raise questions about his knowledge of the world, and he needs to keep their mouth shut. :D
lojong1
Posts: 607
Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2009 2:59 am

Re: Science-Earthquake

Post by lojong1 »

Mawkish1983 wrote:Incidentally, it's a common misconception that the plates float on a liquid. The magma in the mantle is 95-99% solid.
I had mentioned [having read] that the outer-core is liquid; the outer-core is below the mantle. Doesn't matter much to me either way, I'm just using this to spice my Pali lessons. Although it does strike me as a little white of us to say the suttas are wrong about the cause of earthquakes. We still disagree on what the inner core of our planet is really like, except to say that certain waves bounce off and others don't; the speed of gravity only began to be tested in the last 8 years; and magnetic field research is so far from concluded that a single magnetic field (not electromagnetic) propagation speed cannot yet be detected.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outer_core" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;: "The outer core of the Earth is a liquid layer about 2,260 kilometers thick which lies below its mantle."
Another interesting connection between liquids, winds and earthquakes: "Convection of liquid metals in the outer core creates the Earth's magnetic field. This magnetic field extends outward from the Earth for several thousand kilometers, and creates a protective bubble around the Earth that deflects the Sun's solar wind."
:cookoo: Winds from the sun impacting a giant space bubble made by liquids thousands of kilometers under the Earth's crust--liquids that remain physically connected to the bubble through invisible and non-existent yet very real lines of force? :cookoo: Now if that sounds wacky even to the 21st century that came up with it...
Vāto ākāsaṭṭho makes direct contact with Earth's core liquids first. Please don't look in my suttas for something to disagree with, as that is not my job or objective.
Shonin
Posts: 583
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 5:11 am

Re: Science-Earthquake

Post by Shonin »

lojong1 wrote:Although it does strike me as a little white of us to say the suttas are wrong about the cause of earthquakes. We still disagree on what the inner core of our planet is really like,
Well it's a pretty safe bet that it isn't 'wind'
lojong1
Posts: 607
Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2009 2:59 am

Re: Science-Earthquake

Post by lojong1 »

Shonin wrote:Well it's a pretty safe bet that it isn't 'wind'
:clap: Right, it's more likely liquid, as Buddha said.
Equally safe bets:
Subterranean liquids do not create magnetic farmers' fields or blow bubbles around the planet to protect us from solar winds.
'Wind', as we generally use the term, is not Vāto ākāsaṭṭho--nor even Vāto as it is used in this sutta. Nevertheless, wind will suffice when teaching plebs things they don't need to know. 'Space wind' would be especially appropriate where there is no other word or phrase in any language on the planet at the time to describe what you are the first to know!
rahula80
Posts: 79
Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 5:39 pm

Re: Science-Earthquake

Post by rahula80 »

Hi,

Shonin, wind as in movement, in the sense of ayurvedic theory of medicine?

Lojomg1, thanks a lot for digging up those scientific materials. I appreciated it.

Best wishes,
Rahula
Shonin
Posts: 583
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 5:11 am

Re: Science-Earthquake

Post by Shonin »

lojong1 wrote:
Shonin wrote:Well it's a pretty safe bet that it isn't 'wind'
:clap: Right, it's more likely liquid, as Buddha said.
Equally safe bets:
Subterranean liquids do not create magnetic farmers' fields or blow bubbles around the planet to protect us from solar winds.
'Wind', as we generally use the term, is not Vāto ākāsaṭṭho--nor even Vāto as it is used in this sutta. Nevertheless, wind will suffice when teaching plebs things they don't need to know. 'Space wind' would be especially appropriate where there is no other word or phrase in any language on the planet at the time to describe what you are the first to know!
You are having to work hard to bend the meaning of this text in order that it isn't contradicted by reality. What does that tell you?

"This great earth, Ananda, is established upon liquid, the liquid upon the atmosphere, and the atmosphere upon space. And when, Ananda, mighty atmospheric disturbances take place, the liquid is agitated. And with the agitation of the liquid, tremors of the earth arise. This is the first reason, the first cause for the arising of mighty earthquakes." (Digha Nikaya 16)

earth on
liquid on
atmosphere on
space

What the Buddha has described is completely consistent with the picture of the earth/solar system of the people of his time and place. That should tell you something. These people believed that the continents rested upon water on a flat, disc-shaped world.
In antiquity, a cosmological view prevailed in India that held the Earth is a disc that consists of four continents grouped around the central mountain Meru like the petals of a flower. An outer ocean surrounds these continents.[12] This view was elaborated in traditional Jain cosmology and Buddhist cosmology, which depicts the world (in this case solar system/universe and not Earth) as a vast, flat oceanic disk (of the magnitude of a small planetary system), bounded by mountains, in which the continents are set as small islands.[12] The belief in a disk remained the dominant one in Indian cosmology until the early centuries AD, such as in the Puranas:
  • In the Puranas the Earth is a flat-bottomed, circular disk, in the center of which is a lofty mountain, Meru.[12]
source
According to Kalachakra the world system consists of Mt. Meru, sitting on top of four discs of elements, with the realms of all the Gods above. At the very bottom is the black disc of wind, 400,000 yojanas (1 yojana equal approximately 9 miles) in diameter; above it is the red disk of fire, 300,000 yojanas in diameter; next is the white disk of water, 200,000 yojanas in diameter; finally the yellow disk of earth, 100,000 yojanas across. Each of these is 50,000 yojanas in height, and so their total height is 200,000.

In the centre of the disk of earth sits Mt. Meru, 100,000 yojanas in height. Above this, stretching up a further 100,000 yojanas are the realms of the gods, widening to a diameter of 400,000 yojanas. An important feature in this structure is that the total height and the total width are both the same: 400,000 yojanas.
source
lojong1
Posts: 607
Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2009 2:59 am

Re: Science-Earthquake

Post by lojong1 »

Shonin wrote:You are having to work hard to bend the meaning of this text in order that it isn't contradicted by reality.
Not at all, it fits easily for me so far. :clap: Truly, I don't even care if I'm coming across a bit desperate in this thread. The 45,000m long fish had my heart racing until I realized it was in the Asuran Ocean, and wasn't even a fish. It will all be verified scientifically in due time. :alien: Do you think I'm trying harder than y'all are to convince me this contradicts today's science?
Shonin wrote:What the Buddha has described is completely consistent with the picture of the earth/solar system of the people of his time and place. That should tell you something. These people believed that the continents rested upon water on a flat, disc-shaped world.
I bet some of them did.
Regarding all the other information about ancient world views in your post: did Buddha have anything to say about any of it?
rahula80
Posts: 79
Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 5:39 pm

Re: Science-Earthquake

Post by rahula80 »

Hi,

Well, the Flat Earth Society is well and alive.
http://theflatearthsociety.org/cms/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Rahula
Post Reply