Can a Buddhist drink alcohol in moderation?

Buddhist ethical conduct including the Five Precepts (Pañcasikkhāpada), and Eightfold Ethical Conduct (Aṭṭhasīla).
User avatar
bodom
Posts: 7215
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 6:18 pm
Location: San Antonio, Texas

Re: Can a Buddhist drink alcohol in moderation?

Post by bodom »

I face where I am at this moment in time...


And where else could we possibly be. :smile:

There is an AA slogan (ironically) that for me sums up my practice, and your previous post...
"We claim spiritual progress rather than spiritual perfection."


Everyday I try to let go of just a little more greed, hatred and delusion than I had the day before.

:anjali:
Liberation is the inevitable fruit of the path and is bound to blossom forth when there is steady and persistent practice. The only requirements for reaching the final goal are two: to start and to continue. If these requirements are met there is no doubt the goal will be attained. This is the Dhamma, the undeviating law.

- BB
User avatar
ground
Posts: 2591
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 6:01 am

Re: Can a Buddhist drink alcohol in moderation?

Post by ground »

Can a Buddhist drink alcohol in moderation?
I can imaging that a Buddhist can refrain from starting to drink alcohol and then continue until being heavily drunk. But is that moderation? Where is the limit that may be referred to as "moderation"? And once this limit is defined what is the effect on thoughts, motivations, impulses, deeds? But if moderation is defined individually as the dose level where there is not yet an effect on thoughts, motivations, impulses, deeds does this not contradict what is known about alcohol and its effects depending on dose?

Kind regards
User avatar
Hanzze
Posts: 1906
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 12:47 pm
Location: Cambodia

Re: Can a Buddhist drink alcohol in moderation?

Post by Hanzze »

Once there lived in Benares a rich man by the name of Cullasetthi. He was widely known in Benares for his wisdom; he was also a renowned astrologer. One day, it happened that while he was passing along the highway, he came by chance to see a rat apparently dead, lying on the road. He began to muse on the object with interest that from the opportune time he reckoned, it would not be strange to predict the amassing of a great wealth only if the right and fortunate man were to take immediate possession of the dead rat, and dispose of it at the first opportunity.

Little was it known to the astrologer that his fortuitous remark on the tale of the dead rat would have caught the ears of a poor man, Cullantevasika. Pondering that he would have nothing to lose in the bargain, he quietly picked up the dead rat and went on his way.

Not long later, Cullantevasika saw a man looking for some food to feed his hungry cat. It came in handy to be rid of his priceless possession for a few paltry coppers, which would give the poor Cullantevasika the confidence to eke out his miserable existence. He thought it over in his mind the idea to make his little means earn what it possibly could. He spent ail that he had on a few pieces of candy and from the fresh water he could obtain, he offered it for sale as plain sweetened drinks to the florists. For his trouble, he was given a few handfuls of flowers which he sold in the market place and with the proceeds, he bought more candy to turn into a bigger supply of drinks for his customers, the florists. This time they offered him the rest of the unplucked flowers. It enriched him by a few extra coppers, which gave him the security to stand on his own feet and to make him work harder for his living.

One day a heavy storm came and in its fury, trees were uprooted and branches blown all over the park. But, to Cullantevasika, it meant for him a day in the park to clear and tidy up the place clean off the litter of broken branches, dead trunks and fallen leaves. They were given to him as payment for his labour and he sold them as firewood. Again, he went back to his business of candy drinks, which he made a quick sale to the weary travellers outside the city gates. A band of five hundred grass cutters were making their way to the city and at the gate they rested themselves and Cullantevasika was able to supply them with his candy water to quench their thirst. In this way, he managed to have the friendship of the grass-cutters who responded to his cheerful disposition and the friendly manner he conducted his small and humble trade.

Nevertheless, Cullantevasika was on the move for any likely chance to change over to a new trade when it came to him one day that he received news of some merchants sending five hundred horses to the city for sale. He at once thought of his friends the grass-cutters and proceeded immediately on his plan that they all supply him one thousand bundles of grass to be twice their usual bulk on each bundle. On the following day, the merchants and that five hundred horses arrived in the city and they went about in search of fodder for their horses, but none could be found except in the store kept by Cullantevasika. They bought all the stock from him for one thousand coins.

Again, the water labourers brought him the news that a big merchant boat was due to arrive in the port. He bought the best cart in the city and dressed himself up as a rich merchant. Upon the boat’s arrival, he approached the owner of the vessel and offered him an expensive ring in order to solicit his help to use his influence to induce all the merchants to deal with him. As a result all the other merchants who came later failed to secure any business. He acted in the capacity as their agent and the profits he earned rose steadily to the sum of two hundred thousand coins.

Cullantevasika became a rich man and his thought went back to the incident on the highway when he realised the truth of Cullasetthi’s prediction. He paid a courteous visit to Cullasetthi and offered him a gift of one hundred thousand coins with an explanation that he wished to repay him (Cullasetthi) as an appreciation for his good fortune, following the advice on the prediction about the dead rat. And here again, his good fortune served him sell; Cullasetthi seeing his unselfish nature offered him the hand of his (Cullasetthi’s) daughter. They lived happily and on the death of Cullasetthi he inherited all his wealth as well as the high office of treasurer to the king.

So we turn our thoughts, on the conclusion of this story, that work should be performed in a manner clean and free from any intention to jeopardise the living of others, and without inciting a loss or harm. This undertaking alone is noble and unselfish.
Just that! *smile*
...We Buddhists must find the courage to leave our temples and enter the temples of human experience, temples that are filled with suffering. If we listen to Buddha, Christ, or Gandhi, we can do nothing else. The refugee camps, the prisons, the ghettos, and the battlefields will become our temples. We have so much work to do. ... Peace is Possible! Step by Step. - Samtach Preah Maha Ghosananda "Step by Step" http://www.ghosananda.org/bio_book.html

BUT! it is important to become a real Buddhist first. Like Punna did: Punna Sutta Nate sante baram sokham _()_
Paññāsikhara
Posts: 980
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 5:27 am
Contact:

Re: Can a Buddhist drink alcohol in moderation?

Post by Paññāsikhara »

Sylvester wrote:
Paññāsikhara wrote: Buddhist ethics are not a form of "legal" system, wherein some actions are sanctioned and others punished, a kind of "may" or "may not".
They are normative statements about skillful actions leading to the goal.
Dear Bhante

I agree with the 1st sentence.

But what did you have in mind by "normative"? Not a Kantian "categorical imperative", I trust, as it does seem to be mutually exclusive from the "hypothetical imperative" that are skillful actions.

I take it you are a "consequentialist" when it comes to Buddhist ethics?
Thanks for this question, which makes me stop and think a little.

Recently I've been teaching a series of classes on Buddhist Ethics which is part of a Uni Diploma course in Buddhism. It's in Chinese, and so I've been talking about 規範行為, with English "normative..." in the back of my mind.

There are a number of aspects: One is the kind of actions that would fit most closely with those considered to be ideal for following the path; Another has a social element, where that is in a Buddhist social context. There could be more, too.

And reflections about Schopen's comments on the Vinaya texts, often taken by previous scholars to be "descriptive" of the behavior of the Sangha, as opposed to perhaps "ideals" (for want of a better word at present). Something prevents me from using "proscribed" (or "prescribed" for the opposite cases), because that seems to be moving into the legalist sense I'm trying to avoid.

As for consequentialist: Well, recent lecture series by Prof Keown which included asking whether or not Buddhism is virtue ethics, deontological, or consequentialist, had me thinking for a bit. He did make a point that Buddhism has elements of all of them, but mainly virtue and consequentialist (if I recall correctly). He seemed to think that this was maybe a bit contradictory, as though it should be either / or. Perhaps in some systems this would be the case, as there could be examples that clash with both. But, for me, believing in the law of karma which says that a wholesome (= virtuous) act can only have pleasant consequences, and unvirtuous actions unpleasant consequences, I don't see such a great disparity or distance between the two. By my understanding of the Buddhist law of karma, it's almost as though the virtue and consequentialist gap seems to close.

However, I'm no expert on modern philosophical takes on ethics, so I may just be making a great big blotch out of things!

Whatever the case, there is still a problem with either of these approaches when it comes to the fifth precept, because most Buddhist schools take the stance that drinking alcohol is not a nonvirtue itself, unlike the first four precepts which necessarily have at least some amount of unwholesome mental state behind them. In the northern traditions, this precept is called a "precept of avoidance" (something like that!), and the others "precepts by nature".

So this case is trickier than most. (The next tricky one is so-called "sexual-misconduct", but that is for quite different reasons, and disappears vis the celibacy version of "sexual conduct" in toto.)

:focus:
My recently moved Blog, containing some of my writings on the Buddha Dhamma, as well as a number of translations from classical Buddhist texts and modern authors, liturgy, etc.: Huifeng's Prajnacara Blog.
Sylvester
Posts: 2204
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:57 am

Re: Can a Buddhist drink alcohol in moderation?

Post by Sylvester »

Thanks Bhante, for sharing your thoughts.

Of course, the suicides of Ven Channa and Ven Vakkali will pose a conundrum for a consolidated virtues+consequentialism model, if one is to assume that those kamma were not impelled by either patigha (as a mula kamma at the grosser level) or patighanusaya (at the subtler level).

Might this be grounds enough for particularism to creep in, just a wee a bit, into Buddhist ethics?

I think your example about the 5th Precept brings to the fore one of those contentions over how much "control" one must have over one's reactions or actions, before the ethical dimensions can come to play. The possibility of intention (sancetana) playing out unconsciously (eg Bhumija Sutta SN 12.25) and the 3 basic anusayas as inevitable (almost!) responses of putthujanas to all the "bodily" feelings seem to suggest that the traditional understanding of ethics and kamma cannot turn on "control" alone.

How do either virtues ethics or consequential ethics relate to this?

:anjali:
Paññāsikhara
Posts: 980
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 5:27 am
Contact:

Re: Can a Buddhist drink alcohol in moderation?

Post by Paññāsikhara »

Particularism is an easy escape route! :tongue:

But then the evil art of philology will demand an explanation, and heaven and hell shall be overturned in it's quest to find the answer to the question:
Is the Buddha messing us around, or has somebody been doing some hanky panky, cooking the books?
My recently moved Blog, containing some of my writings on the Buddha Dhamma, as well as a number of translations from classical Buddhist texts and modern authors, liturgy, etc.: Huifeng's Prajnacara Blog.
Sanghamitta
Posts: 1614
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:21 am
Location: By the River Thames near London.

Re: Can a Buddhist drink alcohol in moderation?

Post by Sanghamitta »

Sylvester wrote:Thanks Bhante, for sharing your thoughts.

Of course, the suicides of Ven Channa and Ven Vakkali will pose a conundrum for a consolidated virtues+consequentialism model, if one is to assume that those kamma were not impelled by either patigha (as a mula kamma at the grosser level) or patighanusaya (at the subtler level).

Might this be grounds enough for particularism to creep in, just a wee a bit, into Buddhist ethics?

I think your example about the 5th Precept brings to the fore one of those contentions over how much "control" one must have over one's reactions or actions, before the ethical dimensions can come to play. The possibility of intention (sancetana) playing out unconsciously (eg Bhumija Sutta SN 12.25) and the 3 basic anusayas as inevitable (almost!) responses of putthujanas to all the "bodily" feelings seem to suggest that the traditional understanding of ethics and kamma cannot turn on "control" alone.

How do either virtues ethics or consequential ethics relate to this?

:anjali:
I think its not :namaste: so much the POSSIBILITY of sancetana playing out unconsciously ( at least for the vast majority of dhamma students ) but of recognising the CERTAINTY of unconscious but operative volition and of an increased owning of same to bring it into consciousness.
I would further suggest that Sila is only partially congruent with Particularism, Utilitarianism or Deontologicalism...
The going for refuge is the door of entrance to the teachings of the Buddha.

Bhikku Bodhi.
User avatar
Ytrog
Posts: 702
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 4:50 pm
Location: The Netherlands, near Deventer

Re: Can a Buddhist drink alcohol in moderation?

Post by Ytrog »

If you wish to get better and the doctor prescribes medicines you wouldn't ask whether to taken them or not. Same with this: the precepts are (part of the) medicines against dhukka, so if you want to get rid of that disease (dhukka) you have to take your pills/keep the precepts. In the end it's your choice though.

I think the entirety of Buddhist ethics is essentially based on this principle.
Suffering is asking from life what it can never give you.
mindfulness, bliss and beyond (page 8) wrote:Do not linger on the past. Do not keep carrying around coffins full of dead moments
If you see any unskillful speech (or other action) from me let me know, so I can learn from it.
User avatar
mettafuture
Posts: 475
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:13 pm

Re: Can a Buddhist drink alcohol in moderation?

Post by mettafuture »

Paññāsikhara wrote:In the light of the OP:

"Can a Buddhist drink alcohol in moderation?"

The particularly wording and phrasing of the question will once again prompt me to make a statement that I'm becoming more and more accustomed to each and early time I talk about Buddhist ethics.

Buddhist ethics are not a form of "legal" system, wherein some actions are sanctioned and others punished, a kind of "may" or "may not".
They are normative statements about skillful actions leading to the goal.

One "can" do whatever one likes, quite frankly. (But that's not really the question, or the point, is it?)
However, one who has wisdom will do their best to uphold those normative forms of behavior, because they see the results both ways.
Yet, if they are unable to, the only recourse is to the results of this karma, and not some legal system of what they "may" or "may not" do (with possible subsequent reward or punishment).
I really didn't mean for it to be that complicated.

If I had more room in the subject line, I would have put "Can a person who calls themselves a Buddhist drink alcohol in moderation?" If one chooses to undertake the 5 precepts, can they still drink alcohol in moderation? That's all I was wondering.
Sanghamitta
Posts: 1614
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:21 am
Location: By the River Thames near London.

Re: Can a Buddhist drink alcohol in moderation?

Post by Sanghamitta »

If by moderation we mean the occasional glass of wine..or a beer on a hot day. I think so..yes. But not everyone agrees...
I think we have to decide for ourselves what enhances or threatens or is neutral in terms of our mindfulness. And that minfulness is the essence of the precept. Its not that certain things are taboo in general terms. Although for a given individual they might be. It is to some degree an individual issue.
The going for refuge is the door of entrance to the teachings of the Buddha.

Bhikku Bodhi.
User avatar
mettafuture
Posts: 475
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:13 pm

Re: Can a Buddhist drink alcohol in moderation?

Post by mettafuture »

Sanghamitta wrote:If by moderation we mean the occasional glass of wine..or a beer on a hot day. I think so..yes. But not everyone agrees...
I think we have to decide for ourselves what enhances or threatens or is neutral in terms of our mindfulness. And that minfulness is the essence of the precept. Its not that certain things are taboo in general terms. Although for a given individual they might be. It is to some degree an individual issue.
But how can one who chooses to undertake the 5th precept to refrain from intoxicating drinks and drugs still drink? That doesn't make any sense to me. It would be like saying "I will not buy anymore meat products", and then you go out and order a steak. Aren't you just lying to yourself?
User avatar
Ytrog
Posts: 702
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 4:50 pm
Location: The Netherlands, near Deventer

Re: Can a Buddhist drink alcohol in moderation?

Post by Ytrog »

Might I also raise the issue that if you're not used to drinking alcohol even one glass has severe consequences for your mindfulness.
Suffering is asking from life what it can never give you.
mindfulness, bliss and beyond (page 8) wrote:Do not linger on the past. Do not keep carrying around coffins full of dead moments
If you see any unskillful speech (or other action) from me let me know, so I can learn from it.
Sanghamitta
Posts: 1614
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:21 am
Location: By the River Thames near London.

Re: Can a Buddhist drink alcohol in moderation?

Post by Sanghamitta »

mettafuture wrote:
Sanghamitta wrote:If by moderation we mean the occasional glass of wine..or a beer on a hot day. I think so..yes. But not everyone agrees...
I think we have to decide for ourselves what enhances or threatens or is neutral in terms of our mindfulness. And that mindfulness is the essence of the precept. Its not that certain things are taboo in general terms. Although for a given individual they might be. It is to some degree an individual issue.
But how can one who chooses to undertake the 5th precept to refrain from intoxicating drinks and drugs still drink? That doesn't make any sense to me. It would be like saying "I will not buy anymore meat products", and then you go out and order a steak. Aren't you just lying to yourself?
What we undertake to do is to refrain from that which causes heedlessness and intoxication. For many people a glass of wine or beer does not cause intoxication or heedlessness. Furthermore it is not a commandment. It is literally translated, that we undertake " a rule of training." And no I am not " lying to myself". I haven't mentioned my own intake or lack of at all. But I know experienced and dedicated Buddhists who drink the occasional glass of wine or beer .People who have practised dhamma foe many years.

The reference to undertaking not to eat meat and then buying a steak is a non sequitur. We dont undertake not to eat meat.
Last edited by Sanghamitta on Thu Oct 14, 2010 5:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The going for refuge is the door of entrance to the teachings of the Buddha.

Bhikku Bodhi.
Sanghamitta
Posts: 1614
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:21 am
Location: By the River Thames near London.

Re: Can a Buddhist drink alcohol in moderation?

Post by Sanghamitta »

Ytrog wrote:Might I also raise the issue that if you're not used to drinking alcohol even one glass has severe consequences for your mindfulness.
That could be true for some. No one is suggesting that drinking should be compulsary.
The going for refuge is the door of entrance to the teachings of the Buddha.

Bhikku Bodhi.
Individual
Posts: 1970
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 2:19 am

Re: Can a Buddhist drink alcohol in moderation?

Post by Individual »

mettafuture wrote:I've never had a drink, and likely never will.

I was just curious.

:toast: <-- root beer
It is an intoxicant. It makes people say hateful things, and become depressed, anxious, and violent, and you can die from its over-use.

In moderation, alcohol has skillful uses: It has mixed health effects, such that moderation in some cases may or may not have a net health benefit, and it may act as an "ice-breaker" for social events. However, on the second point, alcohol only acts as an ice-breaker because it temporarily hides a person's lack of self-confidence. Being truly at peace with oneself, though, is a permanent ice-breaker for any human interaction you might possibly have.

At the same time, it is unskillful to negatively judge other people (even other Buddhists) who drink alcohol, because just like you, they are trying to follow the path in the way that they see things. If you can't actually demonstrate to others why they should abstain from alcohol, it is wrong to throw dogmatic rules in their face which you can't even explain.
The best things in life aren't things.

The Diamond Sutra
Post Reply