Buddhism and Science :
Compatible?
Incompatible?
or do they belong to different "camps"
Buddhism and Science
Buddhism and Science
“Knowing that this body is just like foam,
understanding it has the nature of a mirage,
cutting off Māra’s flower-tipped arrows,
one should go beyond the King of Death’s sight.”
understanding it has the nature of a mirage,
cutting off Māra’s flower-tipped arrows,
one should go beyond the King of Death’s sight.”
Re: Buddhism and Science
A few thoughts can be found here.
Rain soddens what is kept wrapped up,
But never soddens what is open;
Uncover, then, what is concealed,
Lest it be soddened by the rain.
But never soddens what is open;
Uncover, then, what is concealed,
Lest it be soddened by the rain.
Re: Buddhism and Science
Oh thanks, i forgot about that thread lol
Metta
Metta
“Knowing that this body is just like foam,
understanding it has the nature of a mirage,
cutting off Māra’s flower-tipped arrows,
one should go beyond the King of Death’s sight.”
understanding it has the nature of a mirage,
cutting off Māra’s flower-tipped arrows,
one should go beyond the King of Death’s sight.”
- jcsuperstar
- Posts: 1915
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 5:15 am
- Location: alaska
- Contact:
Re: Buddhism and Science
should be compatible if the buddha was right... but i think a lot of religious stuff is just out of the realm of sience
สัพเพ สัตตา สุขีตา โหนตุ
the mountain may be heavy in and of itself, but if you're not trying to carry it it's not heavy to you- Ajaan Suwat
the mountain may be heavy in and of itself, but if you're not trying to carry it it's not heavy to you- Ajaan Suwat
Re: Buddhism and Science
I'm generally unimpressed by writings on Buddhism and Science. In most cases I've seen the author has little idea of one or other (or both).
I quite like B Alan Wallace's books, since he has a Physics degree, so has a reasonable understanding of Physics.
His book "Choosing Reality" is good, as is the collection that he edited called "Buddhism and Science."
Metta
Mike
I quite like B Alan Wallace's books, since he has a Physics degree, so has a reasonable understanding of Physics.
His book "Choosing Reality" is good, as is the collection that he edited called "Buddhism and Science."
Metta
Mike
Re: Buddhism and Science
Two very different forms of knowing.
All knowledge is compatible for the knowledgeable -- it's those who are ignorant and assume there can only be one valid way of knowing and not others is when we have a problem.
All knowledge is compatible for the knowledgeable -- it's those who are ignorant and assume there can only be one valid way of knowing and not others is when we have a problem.
Re: Buddhism and Science
Bikkhu Buddhadasa was interested in science. He said: "Buddhism is a science and not a philosophy because it studies real things" (see You Tube)
Also, try the essay: "Scientific cure for spiritual disease' on the internet.
Also, try the essay: "Scientific cure for spiritual disease' on the internet.
- retrofuturist
- Posts: 27848
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Buddhism and Science
Greetings,
Generally speaking, science is ontological and Buddhism is phenomenological.
Thus, they both aim to learn more about reality, but via different methods.
Metta,
Retro.
Generally speaking, science is ontological and Buddhism is phenomenological.
Thus, they both aim to learn more about reality, but via different methods.
Metta,
Retro.
"Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things."
Re: Buddhism and Science
Please define.retrofuturist wrote:ontological.... phenomenological.
- retrofuturist
- Posts: 27848
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Buddhism and Science
Greetings Element,
Phenomenology - A philosophy or method of inquiry based on the premise that reality consists of objects and events as they are perceived or understood in human consciousness and not of anything independent of human consciousness.
Ontology - philosophical inquiry into the nature of being itself, a branch of metaphysics.
Actually, ontology probably wasn't the best choice of words to represent science. That would be more relevant for Philosophy. Allow me to change that to...
Empirical - Relying on or derived from observation or experiment: empirical results that supported the hypothesis. Verifiable or provable by means of observation or experiment
All definitions from: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Metta,
Retro.
Phenomenology - A philosophy or method of inquiry based on the premise that reality consists of objects and events as they are perceived or understood in human consciousness and not of anything independent of human consciousness.
Ontology - philosophical inquiry into the nature of being itself, a branch of metaphysics.
Actually, ontology probably wasn't the best choice of words to represent science. That would be more relevant for Philosophy. Allow me to change that to...
Empirical - Relying on or derived from observation or experiment: empirical results that supported the hypothesis. Verifiable or provable by means of observation or experiment
All definitions from: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Metta,
Retro.
"Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things."
Re: Buddhism and Science
Yes, I should have added that. Wallace is careful to distinguish places where there might be some worth in making comparisons and some where there is not.green wrote:Two very different forms of knowing.
green wrote: All knowledge is compatible for the knowledgeable -- it's those who are ignorant and assume there can only be one valid way of knowing and not others is when we have a problem.
I definitely agree that there are different forms of knowledge, but I think we can (not necessarily accurately) make some distinction between "useful" and "useless" forms of knowledge. I.e., just because one accepts different forms of knowledge doesn't mean one has to accept ANY form of knowledge that comes out of someone's mouth (or keyboard)...
For example, some forms of "alternative medicine" may be helpful for certain ailment, though almost impossible to prove "scientifically". Some others are most likely to be dangerous quackery.
Metta
Mike
- retrofuturist
- Posts: 27848
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Buddhism and Science
Greetings Element,
Metta,
Retro.
It is, but only subjectively. Your observations cannot be proven to anyone but yourself.Element wrote:Why is Buddhism not empirical?
Metta,
Retro.
"Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things."
Re: Buddhism and Science
Hi Retro and others,
On the topic of phenomenology vs. ontology, there are some nuances that need to be teased out. The two are not mutually exclusive.
I was browsing E-Sangha and it turns out there is a discussion about the very topic in the Buddhist philosophy forum. I shan't paste the url here; don't know if it is appropriate. But it is worth a read.
Metta,
zavk
On the topic of phenomenology vs. ontology, there are some nuances that need to be teased out. The two are not mutually exclusive.
I was browsing E-Sangha and it turns out there is a discussion about the very topic in the Buddhist philosophy forum. I shan't paste the url here; don't know if it is appropriate. But it is worth a read.
Metta,
zavk
With metta,
zavk
zavk
- retrofuturist
- Posts: 27848
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Buddhism and Science
Greetings zavk,
Feel free to post the link if you think it would be of interest to members.
Metta,
Retro.
Feel free to post the link if you think it would be of interest to members.
Metta,
Retro.
"Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things."