How does "craving" and "objectifying" change the nature of nibbana?
There's a lot of muddled thinking going on here.
Metta,
Paul.

How does "craving" and "objectifying" change the nature of nibbana?
As above, this is a question better suited to a Mahayana Buddhist forum such as Dharma Wheel so it will be closed.
The fact he was, and assented to being known as the Tathagata would suggest otherwise.
Why do you require a phenomenology to account for ontological and metaphysical concerns such as these?Tutareture wrote: ↑Thu Feb 25, 2021 10:38 am I mean more so in terms of concrete atoms and vijnanas arising infinitely anew since beginingless time.
Nonsense. I gave the PTS reference. It's from Nanananda's translation.It eel-wriggling and evasiveness when there is no link to an obscure sutta with an obscure translation.