Page 2 of 2

Re: Are Anicca, Dukkaha and Anatta pre-Buddhist teaching?

Posted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 12:40 am
by form
cappuccino wrote:He was really talking about existence, this is important, without mixing in dependent origination.
The whole dhamma is interconnected. The separations are due to limitations of language in expressing it, it cannot be expressed in a language.

Re: Are Anicca, Dukkaha and Anatta pre-Buddhist teaching?

Posted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 1:00 am
by aflatun
cappuccino wrote:He was really talking about existence, this is important, without mixing in dependent origination.
Can you explain what you mean by this cappuccino?

Re: Are Anicca, Dukkaha and Anatta pre-Buddhist teaching?

Posted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 2:05 am
by cappuccino
http://www.bps.lk/olib/wh/wh372-p.html
The Message of the Velama Sutta

But such wisdom was lost to the world in Velama’s time, as he lived during the empty aeons between the arising of two Buddhas.

Re: Are Anicca, Dukkaha and Anatta pre-Buddhist teaching?

Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2018 9:29 pm
by SarathW
@Lal
Ven Kumara Kassapa explains that Anicca means the emptiness of the subject and object. (existence and non-existence)
Dukkha arises due to seen objects and subjects in the world.
This video is in Sinhalese language


Re: Are Anicca, Dukkaha and Anatta pre-Buddhist teaching?

Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2018 10:19 pm
by cappuccino

Re: Are Anicca, Dukkaha and Anatta pre-Buddhist teaching?

Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2018 6:01 am
by justindesilva
cappuccino wrote: Sat Apr 22, 2017 12:22 am He was really talking about existence, this is important, without mixing in dependent origination.
We talk so much of existence. What really is existance.?
What is the purpose of existence ? What is the relationship of existence and anitya. ?
We only talk about existence that it is dukka.
What is the relationship of existence and anatma?