Kamma
-
- Posts: 2602
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 12:38 pm
Re: Kamma
The beings get born in the arūpa reality and die there according to the kamma-vipāka. It's in the Brahmajāla-sutta and in many other suttas.
How good and wonderful are your days,
How true are your ways?
How true are your ways?
Re: Kamma
We should regard forms phenomena as inconstant, changeable and alterable according to SN25.2.. I think molecules, atoms and smaller units are the scientists' way of explaining the world.
By linking those two, would you keep convinced about the impermanence of the form phenomena? What if advances in science explain there are inalterable particles in the world? Would you be still convinced? Have you already accepted impermanence of form as truth?
I think you don't need stored vibrations to explain your actions driven by your intentions. If what you are looking for is an explanation of the consequences you should read AN4.77 as pointed out by Bundokji above.
And trust this is meant for our own good and progress along the path.“There are these four inconceivables that are not to be conjectured about, that would bring madness & vexation to anyone who conjectured about them. Which four?
.…
“The [precise working out of the] results of kamma.…
Namo Tassa Bhagavato Arahato Sammā Sambuddhassa
Re: Kamma
I understand what u are pointing out is based on the suttas and your intention about the point of making progress is good.mjaviem wrote: ↑Sat Apr 10, 2021 12:14 pmWe should regard forms phenomena as inconstant, changeable and alterable according to SN25.2.. I think molecules, atoms and smaller units are the scientists' way of explaining the world.
By linking those two, would you keep convinced about the impermanence of the form phenomena? What if advances in science explain there are inalterable particles in the world? Would you be still convinced? Have you already accepted impermanence of form as truth?
I think you don't need stored vibrations to explain your actions driven by your intentions. If what you are looking for is an explanation of the consequences you should read AN4.77 as pointed out by Bundokji above.
And trust this is meant for our own good and progress along the path.“There are these four inconceivables that are not to be conjectured about, that would bring madness & vexation to anyone who conjectured about them. Which four?
.…
“The [precise working out of the] results of kamma.…
This is my opinion. Unfortunately the Buddha lived in a time 2500 years before us. So his explanation of the Dhamma is based on the scientific knowledge of that era.
When a modern person has some insights it may come with some modern scientific explanations. For example, Thich Nhat Hanh wrote about a French Scientist that got insight of impermanence when he realised energy cannot be destroyed.
For example, in the note in AN book one on mind, Bhikkhu Bodhi commented that a luminous mind could be something close to subconscious or unconscious.
Re: Kamma
I think his explanations of the Dhamma are based on his own direct observations and understanding of phenomena but I agree with you that he only used knowledge of the time and other resources as a mean of communicating the truth. I think that when he talks about four elements he is teaching the truth from our experience point of view and not teaching an independent objective reality. I don't know if a buddha in our time would use subatomic particles and packets of energy to explain Dhamma but if so, I think it would be as a mean to explain our experience as suffering beings (which I think are synonyms by the way). Whether four elements or subatomic particles are proved to be true or not by scientists is not relevant to the Dhamma.form wrote: ↑Sat Apr 10, 2021 12:49 pm ...his explanation of the Dhamma is based on the scientific knowledge of that era.
When a modern person has some insights it may come with some modern scientific explanations. For example, Thich Nhat Hanh wrote about a French Scientist that got insight of impermanence when he realised energy cannot be destroyed.
For example, in the note in AN book one on mind, Bhikkhu Bodhi commented that a luminous mind could be something close to subconscious or unconscious.
And I think you shouldn't regard living in our time as fortunate nor living 2500 years ago as unfortunate. The only misfortune is to keep clinging to existence
Namo Tassa Bhagavato Arahato Sammā Sambuddhassa
-
- Posts: 2602
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 12:38 pm
Re: Kamma
Reading agganna sutta leads one to compare the Big bang theory with evolution of the earth and further it explains the appearance of a luminous being.This being with tanha has to undergo male female difference of humans with foods becoming rare and thick skinned.mjaviem wrote: ↑Sat Apr 10, 2021 2:21 pmI think his explanations of the Dhamma are based on his own direct observations and understanding of phenomena but I agree with you that he only used knowledge of the time and other resources as a mean of communicating the truth. I think that when he talks about four elements he is teaching the truth from our experience point of view and not teaching an independent objective reality. I don't know if a buddha in our time would use subatomic particles and packets of energy to explain Dhamma but if so, I think it would be as a mean to explain our experience as suffering beings (which I think are synonyms by the way). Whether four elements or subatomic particles are proved to be true or not by scientists is not relevant to the Dhamma.form wrote: ↑Sat Apr 10, 2021 12:49 pm ...his explanation of the Dhamma is based on the scientific knowledge of that era.
When a modern person has some insights it may come with some modern scientific explanations. For example, Thich Nhat Hanh wrote about a French Scientist that got insight of impermanence when he realised energy cannot be destroyed.
For example, in the note in AN book one on mind, Bhikkhu Bodhi commented that a luminous mind could be something close to subconscious or unconscious.
And I think you shouldn't regard living in our time as fortunate nor living 2500 years ago as unfortunate. The only misfortune is to keep clinging to existence
I do not think that these are easily explainable in modern science.
Secondly the first sutta MN 1 , mula paryaya sutta explains earth elements as shuddastaka, apo, tejo, vayo, patavi, varna, gandha, rasa, oja along with its combination of consciousness, while nama rupa is a further explained development. Apo tejo vayo patavi arises as with mutually interchangeable properties . These explained as properties of elements , dhatu, is a proper scientific explanation, reachable in mind as panna. Meditation explained as sathara sathipattana and its effects are still under experiments with behaviour as alpha and gamma rays. All scintific basis of what the budda said can be understood with meditation and laid down with modern science.
Re: Kamma
I don't know pali but to me, MN1 is not about the physical world but about our experience of the world. It is not describing the world, it only talks about perceiving and conceiving, without any concern about explaining an independent world à la science. If science finds analogous results or not is not relevant.justindesilva wrote: ↑Sat Apr 10, 2021 5:09 pm ...
Secondly the first sutta MN 1 , mula paryaya sutta explains earth elements as shuddastaka, apo, tejo, vayo, patavi, varna, gandha, rasa, oja along with its combination of consciousness, while nama rupa is a further explained development. Apo tejo vayo patavi arises as with mutually interchangeable properties . These explained as properties of elements , dhatu, is a proper scientific explanation, reachable in mind as panna. Meditation explained as sathara sathipattana and its effects are still under experiments with behaviour as alpha and gamma rays. All scintific basis of what the budda said can be understood with meditation and laid down with modern science.
In MN1, he uses the concept of the elements (popular at the time) to teach that ordinary people haven't understood that the elements must not be taken as self. He doesn't declare the reality of the four elements nor rejects it, he is talking only about the peception people have of them. Then he takes the concept of beings to teach the same truth. He takes the concept of gods, lord of creation and brahma for the same reason. In this Sutta he is not teaching about gods and the lord of creation and brahma. He is teaching that whoever takes them to be self is someone who hasn't fully understood. He continues on with gods of Streaming Radiance, Refulgent Glory, Great Fruit, the Overlord, but I don't read that the Buddha is teaching about their reality, only the perception people have of them and they wrongly conceiving a self from them. Base of infinite space, base of infinite consciousness, base of nothingness, base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception, etc. all is about the perceptions people reach of these. It's not relevant if there is an independent reality for them or not. And I think if science reaches to conclusions similar to the teachings the only relevancy could be to use this new belief people acquire to teach the Dhamma accordingly.
PS.: Sorry, I need to read DN27 to make a reply for it.
Namo Tassa Bhagavato Arahato Sammā Sambuddhassa
Re: Kamma
The creation sutta is very scientific. I see physics and evolution in it. There are areas that modern science still do not understand like energies, time and its dimensions.justindesilva wrote: ↑Sat Apr 10, 2021 5:09 pmReading agganna sutta leads one to compare the Big bang theory with evolution of the earth and further it explains the appearance of a luminous being.This being with tanha has to undergo male female difference of humans with foods becoming rare and thick skinned.mjaviem wrote: ↑Sat Apr 10, 2021 2:21 pmI think his explanations of the Dhamma are based on his own direct observations and understanding of phenomena but I agree with you that he only used knowledge of the time and other resources as a mean of communicating the truth. I think that when he talks about four elements he is teaching the truth from our experience point of view and not teaching an independent objective reality. I don't know if a buddha in our time would use subatomic particles and packets of energy to explain Dhamma but if so, I think it would be as a mean to explain our experience as suffering beings (which I think are synonyms by the way). Whether four elements or subatomic particles are proved to be true or not by scientists is not relevant to the Dhamma.form wrote: ↑Sat Apr 10, 2021 12:49 pm ...his explanation of the Dhamma is based on the scientific knowledge of that era.
When a modern person has some insights it may come with some modern scientific explanations. For example, Thich Nhat Hanh wrote about a French Scientist that got insight of impermanence when he realised energy cannot be destroyed.
For example, in the note in AN book one on mind, Bhikkhu Bodhi commented that a luminous mind could be something close to subconscious or unconscious.
And I think you shouldn't regard living in our time as fortunate nor living 2500 years ago as unfortunate. The only misfortune is to keep clinging to existence
I do not think that these are easily explainable in modern science.
Secondly the first sutta MN 1 , mula paryaya sutta explains earth elements as shuddastaka, apo, tejo, vayo, patavi, varna, gandha, rasa, oja along with its combination of consciousness, while nama rupa is a further explained development. Apo tejo vayo patavi arises as with mutually interchangeable properties . These explained as properties of elements , dhatu, is a proper scientific explanation, reachable in mind as panna. Meditation explained as sathara sathipattana and its effects are still under experiments with behaviour as alpha and gamma rays. All scintific basis of what the budda said can be understood with meditation and laid down with modern science.
MN1 will be a middle way. Either extremes in view will be too much.
Re: Kamma
Apparently lots of scientific discoveries were talked about in the Qur’an too. Go figure
“Knowing that this body is just like foam,
understanding it has the nature of a mirage,
cutting off Māra’s flower-tipped arrows,
one should go beyond the King of Death’s sight.”
understanding it has the nature of a mirage,
cutting off Māra’s flower-tipped arrows,
one should go beyond the King of Death’s sight.”
Re: Kamma
Buddhism by far is the most scientific. If I am not wrong, that is a comment from Albert Einstein.
Even the theme "attached to aggregates is suffering" is very scientific because it required one to explore it.
Re: Kamma
I think that even if science after some discoveries explains that we are trapped in a time & space illusion and that escaping the illusion of death is theoretically possible and that we could be beyond even the subtlest forms of suffering of our existence, beyond time and space, it would be inspiring but irrelevant.
The trustworthy source for faith to find liberation should be the Suttas. If we put our trust in science first it can quickly change its message and leave us confused. I believe the Buddha's teachings are consistent and the taught Dhamma timeless. I think the teachings are king among any explanations of our existence. If the concern is the basics of galaxies dynamics or quantum behaviors, then I would trust science first but to find liberating truths is to follow the Buddhas advice of practice and to not question the workings of kamma as in this thread (which I'm not saying I don't do).
The trustworthy source for faith to find liberation should be the Suttas. If we put our trust in science first it can quickly change its message and leave us confused. I believe the Buddha's teachings are consistent and the taught Dhamma timeless. I think the teachings are king among any explanations of our existence. If the concern is the basics of galaxies dynamics or quantum behaviors, then I would trust science first but to find liberating truths is to follow the Buddhas advice of practice and to not question the workings of kamma as in this thread (which I'm not saying I don't do).
Namo Tassa Bhagavato Arahato Sammā Sambuddhassa
- cappuccino
- Posts: 12879
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 1:45 am
- Contact:
Re: Kamma
your intentions affect your mind
your mind affects you and your future