It is, and it's associated with the following mantraCoëmgenu wrote: ↑Sat Oct 16, 2021 8:00 pm Well, the absorption corresponding to the base of nothingness is literally concerning "nothing," no? Something vs nothing is a fine contrasting. Greed, rage, etc., are "something" and the sage is "nothing" in comparison.
How is it negated "twice" if it's "something?" I don't follow that.
"I might not be, and it might not be mine. I will not be, and it will not be mine."
It's certainly negating the self (from the mistaken position of a self) and very likely negating anything worth having, it seems to me. I said it's repetitive because you would have Nothingness negating "things" followed by the signless negating "things". The other interpretation is that Nothingness negates things to own, whilst the signless negates sense experience altogether.