Vipassanā: What Is Dissolution, Really?

Exploring Theravāda's connections to other paths - what can we learn from other traditions, religions and philosophies?
Post Reply
Nyana
Posts: 2233
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 11:56 am

Vipassanā: What Is Dissolution, Really?

Post by Nyana »

It's common in teachings and texts on vipassanā to hear that mind (nāma) and matter (rūpa) are actually comprised of discrete, momentary things undergoing incessant dissolution (bhaṅga). For example:

Ledi Sayādaw, A Manual of the Excellent Man:
  • In the ultimate sense, however, new psychophysical phenomena arise only after the old phenomena have perished, which is death. This constant perishing of phenomena is also called cessation (nirodha) or dissolution (bhaṅga). It is only when one discerns the ultimate truth of this cessation of phenomena that one gains insight.
Mahāsi Sayādaw, The Great Discourse on the Anattalakkhaṇa Sutta:
  • The yogī perceives that all the nāmas, rūpas which manifest themselves at the moment of seeing, hearing etc., are undergoing instant dissolution and are, therefore, transient.... When the yogī comes to the bhaṅga stage, during the interval of one cycle of rising and falling, numerous moments of dissolution will be seen to flit by. The material body of rising and falling, being subjected to incessant dissolution is indeed not permanent.
Sayāgyi U Ba Khin, The Essentials of Buddha-Dhamma in Meditative Practice:
  • The Buddha taught his disciples that everything that exists at the material level is composed of kalāpas. Kalāpas are material units very much smaller than atoms, which die out almost immediately after they come into being.... The life-span of a kalāpa is termed a “moment,” and a trillion such moments are said to elapse during the wink of a man’s eye.
S.N. Goenka, Meditation Now:
  • Every moment, masses of subatomic particles — kalāpas — within the framework of the body, arise and pass away, arise and pass away. How do they arise? The cause becomes clear as you investigate the reality as it is without influence from any past conditioning of philosophical beliefs. The material input, the food that you have taken, becomes a cause for these kalāpas to arise. You will also find that kalāpas arise and pass away due to the climatic atmosphere around you.
Pa Auk Sayādaw, The Practice Which Leads to Nibbāna:
  • The meditator discerns the five khandhas, in the past, present, and future both internally and externally and seeing only the passing away and ceasing of them he applies the three characteristics one at a time. At the time when a meditator takes matter as an object and sees it passing away and knows that it is impermanent; this knowledge of impermanence of an object is called insight knowledge.
Questions:

(i) Is it really true that mind (nāma) and matter (rūpa) are discrete, momentary things undergoing incessant dissolution?

(ii) Is it really true that matter is comprised of momentary kalāpas which undergo incessant dissolution?

(iii) If so, how do you know this to be true?

(iv) If not, can "insight" into conceptual fictions really be considered insight at all?

:candle:
User avatar
cooran
Posts: 8503
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 11:32 pm
Location: Queensland, Australia

Re: Vipassanā: What Is Dissolution, Really?

Post by cooran »

Hello Ñāṇa,

Could you start by telling the members in detail what you think?

with metta
Chris
---The trouble is that you think you have time---
---Worry is the Interest, paid in advance, on a debt you may never owe---
---It's not what happens to you in life that is important ~ it's what you do with it ---
User avatar
Ben
Posts: 18438
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:49 am
Location: kanamaluka

Re: Vipassanā: What Is Dissolution, Really?

Post by Ben »

cooran wrote:Hello Ñāṇa,

Could you start by telling the members in detail what you think?

with metta
Chris
I think we already know what Geoff thinks, Chris.
kind regards,

Ben
“No lists of things to be done. The day providential to itself. The hour. There is no later. This is later. All things of grace and beauty such that one holds them to one's heart have a common provenance in pain. Their birth in grief and ashes.”
- Cormac McCarthy, The Road

Learn this from the waters:
in mountain clefts and chasms,
loud gush the streamlets,
but great rivers flow silently.
- Sutta Nipata 3.725

Compassionate Hands Foundation (Buddhist aid in Myanmar) • Buddhist Global ReliefUNHCR

e: [email protected]..
User avatar
retrofuturist
Posts: 27848
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Vipassanā: What Is Dissolution, Really?

Post by retrofuturist »

Greetings Geoff,

I'll have a go at your questions, but bear in mind I'm not overly familiar with the detailed teachings of those you quote above, so I'll answer from my own perspective.
(i) Is it really true that mind (nāma) and matter (rūpa) are discrete, momentary things undergoing incessant dissolution?
There's a lot of things wrapped up in that! By "discrete, momentary things" I assume you're talking about kalapas, at which point I'll move to the next question
(ii) Is it really true that matter is comprised of momentary kalāpas which undergo incessant dissolution?
I don't know. Following the logic of the Simsapa Sutta, the fact the Buddha did not teach it means it is not of relevance to me in a Dhammic context.
(iii) If so, how do you know this to be true?
n/a
(iv) If not, can "insight" into conceptual fictions really be considered insight at all?
Well you take a leap in logic here that they are "conceptual fictions". They may well be, I don't know.... for me it goes in the category along with God - if he ever shows his face, I'll say "hi". Ditto with kalapas. Until then I'm not overly concerned.

What I do know is that I'm not going to be basing a "seeing things as they really are" practice around something that I'm not directly observing or experiencing.

Metta,
Retro. :)
"Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things."
User avatar
Prasadachitta
Posts: 974
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 6:52 am
Location: San Francisco (The Mission) Ca USA
Contact:

Re: Vipassanā: What Is Dissolution, Really?

Post by Prasadachitta »

Ñāṇa wrote: Questions:

(i) Is it really true that mind (nāma) and matter (rūpa) are discrete, momentary things undergoing incessant dissolution?

(ii) Is it really true that matter is comprised of momentary kalāpas which undergo incessant dissolution?

(iii) If so, how do you know this to be true?

(iv) If not, can "insight" into conceptual fictions really be considered insight at all?

:candle:
Hi Nana,

1) Im inclined not to think so. That being said Ive been looking into it with an open mind for a while. Somehow its been a very helpful practice to not find "discrete, momentary things undergoing incessant dissolution". I continue to enjoy not finding them. I wonder what it would be like if I took it for granted that they are not there.

2) NA

3)Yes. If its insight its insight. Perhaps the conceptual fictions are to be seen for what they are. We need to start with either existence or non existence and I dont think we really get much of a say in where we start (at least not in the proximate unenlightened situation). Of course insight is not just insight because you call it insight. It must begin to bring an end to the fires of Greed, Hate, and Delusion to qualify. I am not interested in Burmese Vipasana style but I would not be surprised if it results in Insight. In fact I would be surprised if it did not. That is not to say that I would recommend it. I don't recommend things I have not tried myself unless people seem excited about it. If thats the case, I think "Well I guess this person better look into that then."


Take care

Prasadachitta
"Beautifully taught is the Lord's Dhamma, immediately apparent, timeless, of the nature of a personal invitation, progressive, to be attained by the wise, each for himself." Anguttara Nikaya V.332
User avatar
tiltbillings
Posts: 23046
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am

Re: Vipassanā: What Is Dissolution, Really?

Post by tiltbillings »

The only question here of any real significance:
Ñāṇa wrote:(iv) If not, can "insight" into conceptual fictions really be considered insight at all?
Considering that, for example, the notion of the khandhas is an arbitrary conceptual fiction used as a way to talk about/understand the process of experience, this is not really a meaningful question. It is not the so-called "conceptual fictions " into which we have insight.
>> Do you see a man wise [enlightened/ariya] in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.<< -- Proverbs 26:12

This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.

“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
alan
Posts: 3111
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:14 am
Location: Miramar beach, Fl.

Re: Vipassanā: What Is Dissolution, Really?

Post by alan »

Well...maybe not.
Nana quantified his questions strictly, perhaps as a way of forcing an argument. There is obviously no way to prove or disprove momentary kalapas, therefore anyone assuming their existence is forced into an untenable position. The significant question is "how do you know this to be true?"

The concept of momentary kalapas, agree with it or not, was not mentioned in the suttas, and therefore has much less weight than "the notion of khandas". (Which I would not consider an arbitrary conceptual fiction).
User avatar
tiltbillings
Posts: 23046
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am

Re: Vipassanā: What Is Dissolution, Really?

Post by tiltbillings »

alan wrote:Well...maybe not.
Nana quantified his questions strictly, perhaps as a way of forcing an argument. There is obviously no way to prove or disprove momentary kalapas, therefore anyone assuming their existence is forced into an untenable position. The significant question is "how do you know this to be true?"

The concept of momentary kalapas, agree with it or not, was not mentioned in the suttas, and therefore has much less weight than "the notion of khandas". (Which I would not consider an arbitrary conceptual fiction).
Good response, but " kalāpas" seems not to be a Ledi Sayadaw or Mahasi Sayadaw thing, though kalāpas does seem to indicate (and please note the wording here) a way of talking about meditative experience according to others.

So, are the khandhas real things?
>> Do you see a man wise [enlightened/ariya] in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.<< -- Proverbs 26:12

This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.

“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
User avatar
ground
Posts: 2591
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 6:01 am

Re: Vipassanā: What Is Dissolution, Really?

Post by ground »

retrofuturist wrote:What I do know is that I'm not going to be basing a "seeing things as they really are" practice around something that I'm not directly observing or experiencing.
Sounds reasonable. Otherwise one may be confusing "insight" with some sort of "autosuggestion"/self-persuasion: If one constantly cultivates a particular thought about how things are one will reach a point where things appear exactly in that way.

kind regards
Nyana
Posts: 2233
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 11:56 am

Re: Vipassanā: What Is Dissolution, Really?

Post by Nyana »

retrofuturist wrote:By "discrete, momentary things" I assume you're talking about kalapas, at which point I'll move to the next question
I meant discrete, momentary dhammas, not necessarily kalāpas. Hence, different questions.
retrofuturist wrote:Well you take a leap in logic here that they are "conceptual fictions".
Would "untrue" be preferable? I'm not looking to split hairs. Conventionally speaking, if something is not true it is untrue.
alan wrote:Nana quantified his questions strictly, perhaps as a way of forcing an argument.
Just wondering how people relate to these ideas.
tiltbillings wrote:this is not really a meaningful question.
Feel free to reword the question so that it's meaningful for you.


Thanks everyone who's responded so far. :smile:
User avatar
tiltbillings
Posts: 23046
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am

Re: Vipassanā: What Is Dissolution, Really?

Post by tiltbillings »

Ñāṇa wrote:
tiltbillings wrote:this is not really a meaningful question.
Feel free to reword the question so that it's meaningful for you.
The question is not grounded in a meaningful assumption, thus nothing to re-word.
>> Do you see a man wise [enlightened/ariya] in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.<< -- Proverbs 26:12

This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.

“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
User avatar
retrofuturist
Posts: 27848
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Vipassanā: What Is Dissolution, Really?

Post by retrofuturist »

Greetings Geoff,
Ñāṇa wrote:I meant discrete, momentary dhammas, not necessarily kalāpas. Hence, different questions.
I regard all dhammas (other than nibbana) as being sankhata dhamma conditioned by avijja, and consciousness of them as being inherently dependent on name-and-form (not mind-and-body, of which I'm ambivalent) like in the simile of the reeds.

On that basis, the question of the objective (i.e. not formed by such things as avijja, name-and-form etc) reality of dhammas, which I think is what you're getting at, is something that cannot be known, as it is outside loka. Any perception of impermanence is perception with respect to sankharas and not with respect to anything 'real'.

If it is fabricated as "perception of impermanence of something real" than it is a perception that is in error.

Is there potential liberative insight possible from erroneous perceptions? I don't know (and don't intend to experiment and find out).

Metta,
Retro. :)
"Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things."
Nyana
Posts: 2233
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 11:56 am

Re: Vipassanā: What Is Dissolution, Really?

Post by Nyana »

tiltbillings wrote:The question is not grounded in a meaningful assumption, thus nothing to re-word.
The OP offers a representative selection of quotations from well known vipassanā teachers on the dissolution of discrete, momentary dhammas, which is a stage of insight meditation as they teach it. Question: How do you relate to these ideas?
User avatar
tiltbillings
Posts: 23046
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am

Re: Vipassanā: What Is Dissolution, Really?

Post by tiltbillings »

Ñāṇa wrote:
tiltbillings wrote:The question is not grounded in a meaningful assumption, thus nothing to re-word.
The OP offers a representative selection of quotations from well known vipassanā teachers on the dissolution of discrete, momentary dhammas, which is a stage of insight meditation as they teach it. Question: How do you relate to these ideas?
I do believe I have already indicated how I relate to these ideas in my response to you and Alan.

http://www.dhammawheel.com/viewtopic.ph ... 53#p162171" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.dhammawheel.com/viewtopic.ph ... 53#p162181" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
>> Do you see a man wise [enlightened/ariya] in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.<< -- Proverbs 26:12

This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.

“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
Nyana
Posts: 2233
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 11:56 am

Re: Vipassanā: What Is Dissolution, Really?

Post by Nyana »

tiltbillings wrote:It is not the so-called "conceptual fictions " into which we have insight.
Then what is the basis for insight?
Post Reply