Ok sam, you was already boring along time ago back your books were done here you have had your daily stimulation of insults
Coëmgenu
This is why within the native traditions as they are in their natural environment hold no real value to historical figures, Buddha is not a prophet or a historical person, in nath sampradaya which is an ancient oral tradition the story of Buddha is a pravachana Katha wisdom stories, they are timeless and applicable even today
You mentioned that Sri Lanka says the Buddha has his history there it’s a bit hard on my phone to quote you exactly but why would that be a problem why does Buddha have to be only one individual isn’t Buddha a potential within everyone
Isn’t there a deeper meaning behind this,for me and what I have learned Buddha simple means mind awakening to the way things are, it doesn’t have to be more complicated than that, we dont even need to hav a philosophical view
The languages are also nama and rupa and represent a form of consciousness, I have attempted to explain this here but if it’s not the mundane name and form of mental and physical phenomena then it’s invalid , it’s quite hard to describe in English at least for me anyway, because English doesn’t have the right equivalents
There was a thread about 84000 vihara of Ashoka and nobody knows where they are, what was interesting is that the colonials when first trying to find the person Ashoka the natives didn’t know who he was , I wrote a reply but admins took it down because vihara doesn’t necessarily mean a temple made of bricks and Mortar. Like Buddha Ashoka and pandavas and kauravas these are all stories that describe something deeper.
Mary is probably part of a culture synthesis where in ancient Britain and Europe a form of Devi or divine feminine was proceeding protecting and manifesting the ultimate reality and gradually they replaced all existing forms of divine feminine into one system because there are no traces or written records of pre Roman Britain or very few because they destroyed most it , if not for sujata Buddha to be would not have attained Bodhi or enlightenment, but this is seldom spoke about, obviously there is a deeper esoteric meaning to this other than a physical historic account of the Buddha to be fasting and then a village girl giving him some rice porridge
If Buddha dharma is a bhagavat dharma then the divine feminine has to be there one way or another or they are erasing it
In pali and other Buddha traditions and traditions what is the meaning of Bhagavan avoiding mundane concepts religious ideas such as an external god
What does the writing say in your signature and how do use vi ra hūṁ khaṁ as a mantra
Thanks