If my memory is correct, there is something called Nama Vibhaga (nama analysis) is taught:
There are 3 definitions for nama, in 3 different contexts.
1. Nama in Paramattha: Citta + Cetasika + Nibbana (or Vinnana+VedanaSannaSankhara+Nibbana)
2. Nama in Namarupa paricceda: Citta + Cetasika (or Vinnana+VedanaSannaSankhara)
3. Nama in Paticcasamuppada: Cetasika (or VedanaSannaSankhara )
Sankhara = Cetana+Phassa+Manasikara : because they are considered the main factors of sankhara whichrelated to nama's bending quality.
Terefore, 3. Nama = Vedana+Sanna+Cetana+Phassa+Manasikara
What really are the five factors of Nama ?
Re: What really are the five factors of Nama ?
Inner: vedanākkhandho, saññākkhandho,
saṅkhārakkhandho, viññāṇakkhandho.
"Phasso" is in the saṅkhārakkhandho group.
"Cetanā" is in the "intention (cetayitatto/sañcetayitatto),
born of elemental contact appropriate the mind cognition
(tajjāmanoviññāṇadhātusamphassajā)".
Four nutriments:
1. Physical food (kabaliṅkāro),
2. Contact (phasso),
3. Mental volition (manosañcetanā),
4. Consciousness (viññāṇo).
"Manasikāro" similar to wisdom, perhaps a combination of
all the inner or aggregates of consciousness (inner essence).
Gwi: "There are only-two Sakaṽādins:
Theraṽādå&Ṽibhajjaṽādå, the rest are
nonsakaṽādins!"
Theraṽādå&Ṽibhajjaṽādå, the rest are
nonsakaṽādins!"