Anyway, the point is that such things are incorrect. Taking various compound Pāḷi words such as "bhavanirodha" to define "bhava," is obviously not valid.
Pali Term: Bhava
Re: Pali Term: Bhava
Going through the other thread—exactly as in this thread, where DooDoot defines "bhava" using a passage describing "bhavanirdho"—it seems this is done in other instances, in the case of the other thread, defining "bhava" using terms such as "bhavāsava":