Best age to be a monk?
Best age to be a monk?
What is the best time to be a monk?
Hiriottappasampannā,
sukkadhammasamāhitā;
Santo sappurisā loke,
devadhammāti vuccare.
https://suttacentral.net/ja6/en/chalmer ... ight=false
sukkadhammasamāhitā;
Santo sappurisā loke,
devadhammāti vuccare.
https://suttacentral.net/ja6/en/chalmer ... ight=false
- JamesTheGiant
- Posts: 2147
- Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2015 8:41 am
- Location: New Zealand
Re: Best age to be a monk?
All ages are good! Best time is right now!
I know monks who have ordained in their late 60s and they are doing well.
But the BEST age? Maybe late 20s, early 30s? Old enough to have experienced the world properly, but young enough to have energy for long practise.
I have met some young people in their late teens and early 20s intending to ordain, and they generally don't stay long. Too restless maybe, and they have not much experience of life.
I know monks who have ordained in their late 60s and they are doing well.
But the BEST age? Maybe late 20s, early 30s? Old enough to have experienced the world properly, but young enough to have energy for long practise.
I have met some young people in their late teens and early 20s intending to ordain, and they generally don't stay long. Too restless maybe, and they have not much experience of life.
-
- Posts: 1783
- Joined: Thu May 12, 2016 5:29 pm
- Location: United States
Re: Best age to be a monk?
Best time is 10 years ago, second best time is now.
But in actuality, i would say 20s is the best age to be a monk in general (since that is the earliest age you can recieve the higher ordination). It is also better because you are less likely to suffer from age related health problems which would hinder your practice so you can progress without health issues getting in the way. But in actuality, like many things in Buddhism, i think its a case by case basis that depends on the individual, for some people they are too mentally distracted in thier 20s or would seriously benefit from some real world layperson experience so maybe a later age is better for those people.
But in actuality, i would say 20s is the best age to be a monk in general (since that is the earliest age you can recieve the higher ordination). It is also better because you are less likely to suffer from age related health problems which would hinder your practice so you can progress without health issues getting in the way. But in actuality, like many things in Buddhism, i think its a case by case basis that depends on the individual, for some people they are too mentally distracted in thier 20s or would seriously benefit from some real world layperson experience so maybe a later age is better for those people.
"Do not have blind faith, but also no blind criticism" - the 14th Dalai Lama
"The Blessed One has set in motion the unexcelled Wheel of Dhamma that cannot be stopped by brahmins, devas, Maras, Brahmas or anyone in the cosmos." -Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta
"The Blessed One has set in motion the unexcelled Wheel of Dhamma that cannot be stopped by brahmins, devas, Maras, Brahmas or anyone in the cosmos." -Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta
Re: Best age to be a monk?
This is a good question.
I always object to children's ordination. However, there are pros and cons to this.
If you want to be a very knowledgeable (Tipitaka, Pali, etc) monk it is better to be a monk at a young age.
The problem of ordination young people is the lack of life experience.
The most important perhaps is the sexual experience. Many monks disrobe for a woman.
Considering the fact that Buddha is not alive and the Dhamma is scattered I think the best time to marry is with some life experience.
I voted 30 plus.
I always object to children's ordination. However, there are pros and cons to this.
If you want to be a very knowledgeable (Tipitaka, Pali, etc) monk it is better to be a monk at a young age.
The problem of ordination young people is the lack of life experience.
The most important perhaps is the sexual experience. Many monks disrobe for a woman.
Considering the fact that Buddha is not alive and the Dhamma is scattered I think the best time to marry is with some life experience.
I voted 30 plus.
“As the lamp consumes oil, the path realises Nibbana”
- Bhikkhu_Jayasara
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 11:54 am
- Contact:
Re: Best age to be a monk?
whatever age they develop enough wisdom and insight that will allow them to whether the ups and downs, stay ordained, and thrive in the holy life.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Bhikkhu Jayasāra -http://www.youtube.com/studentofthepath and https://maggasekha.org/
Bhikkhu Jayasāra -http://www.youtube.com/studentofthepath and https://maggasekha.org/
Re: Best age to be a monk?
I always have urge to be a monk. I'm now 29 years old. But I think it would be irresponsible to leave my old aged parents behind now. Better I will be with them at this time of uncertainty.
If I become a Theravada monk in the future, I will not be actively participate in public talks, video talks or temple activities, rather I will devote myself to some Dhutanga practices and meditation.
If I become a Theravada monk in the future, I will not be actively participate in public talks, video talks or temple activities, rather I will devote myself to some Dhutanga practices and meditation.
Hiriottappasampannā,
sukkadhammasamāhitā;
Santo sappurisā loke,
devadhammāti vuccare.
https://suttacentral.net/ja6/en/chalmer ... ight=false
sukkadhammasamāhitā;
Santo sappurisā loke,
devadhammāti vuccare.
https://suttacentral.net/ja6/en/chalmer ... ight=false
Re: Best age to be a monk?
Meanwhile, you can do a lot of groundwork as a layperson.Ontheway wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 6:23 am I always have urge to be a monk. I'm now 29 years old. But I think it would be irresponsible to leave my old aged parents behind now. Better I will be with them at this time of uncertainty.
If I become a Theravada monk in the future, I will not be actively participate in public talks, video talks or temple activities, rather I will devote myself to some Dhutanga practices and meditation.
Study Tipitaka, learn Pali, and observe eight precepts.
Many monks are using cash nowadays so you can be practice at home very close to being a monk except observing Vinaya rules.
“As the lamp consumes oil, the path realises Nibbana”
Re: Best age to be a monk?
Yes, I do practice 8 precepts quite frequent (even I'm not in temple). I am used to the "no meal afternoon" and "no entertainment".SarathW wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 10:00 amMeanwhile, you can do a lot of groundwork as a layperson.Ontheway wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 6:23 am I always have urge to be a monk. I'm now 29 years old. But I think it would be irresponsible to leave my old aged parents behind now. Better I will be with them at this time of uncertainty.
If I become a Theravada monk in the future, I will not be actively participate in public talks, video talks or temple activities, rather I will devote myself to some Dhutanga practices and meditation.
Study Tipitaka, learn Pali, and observe eight precepts.
Many monks are using cash nowadays so you can be practice at home very close to being a monk except observing Vinaya rules.
Hiriottappasampannā,
sukkadhammasamāhitā;
Santo sappurisā loke,
devadhammāti vuccare.
https://suttacentral.net/ja6/en/chalmer ... ight=false
sukkadhammasamāhitā;
Santo sappurisā loke,
devadhammāti vuccare.
https://suttacentral.net/ja6/en/chalmer ... ight=false
Re: Best age to be a monk?
IMHO, the earlier the better because you never know how long you have to live. All of us can die at any time. As one ages the body and mind are less and less capable, have less and less energy, and learning new things becomes harder and harder...
If one ordains at 20, and soon disrobes, one can re-ordain a bit later. But one cannot travel back in time when one was young...
Last edited by Alex123 on Wed Dec 01, 2021 12:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Best age to be a monk?
Thanks for the advice.Alex123 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 12:49 pmIMHO, as soon as you are ready. The earlier the better because you never know how long you have to live. All of us can die at any time.
Furthermore, as one ages the body and mind are less and less capable, less and less energy, and learning new things becomes harder and harder...
Hiriottappasampannā,
sukkadhammasamāhitā;
Santo sappurisā loke,
devadhammāti vuccare.
https://suttacentral.net/ja6/en/chalmer ... ight=false
sukkadhammasamāhitā;
Santo sappurisā loke,
devadhammāti vuccare.
https://suttacentral.net/ja6/en/chalmer ... ight=false
Re: Best age to be a monk?
It is wrong to think that a young person is by default less ready to dedicate themselves to the monk life. On the contrary: the younger a person is, the less rubbish they'll need to clear out from their mind before they can truly get started with the practice.
Spending more time in the world, especially if it involves doing things which contradict the ethos of a monastic (or worse, of a highly virtuous layman) cannot somehow put you in a better position to live the monastic life, let alone reap its benefits. That's like saying that keeping a piece of wood in the water for longer makes it easier to dry it out afterward. (See MN 36, wet wood simile).
The reason why older people could be more prepared for monastic life is Not because of the worldly and often unskillful experiences they've accumulated over the years, but rather because they sometimes (not always) have more perspective of their existence and of their dukkha (the basis for all Dhamma practice).
And that perspective is acquired through authentic and careful examination of one's perilous situation in saṃsāra, which often creates a certain anxiety (saṃvega, see below sutta), and this can make it feel like ordination is simply not optional. And if one remains heedful, that feeling would likely persist throught one's monastic life.
MN 29:
“...Bhikkhus, here some clansman goes forth out of faith from the home life into homelessness, considering: ‘I am a victim of birth, ageing, and death, of sorrow, lamentation, pain, grief, and despair; I am a victim of suffering, a prey to suffering. Surely an ending of this whole mass of suffering can be known...’"
If a young person can successfuly carry out that examination and take action early (i.e. ordain), the better off they will be without those additional wordly experiences, the majority of which would likely do little else than strengthen the very defilements that could one day press them to return to worldly life. Any practical advantages of a longer lay-life are trifle in light of that possible danger, Plus the billion things that could unexpectedly go wrong if a person decides to wait.
Spending more time in the world, especially if it involves doing things which contradict the ethos of a monastic (or worse, of a highly virtuous layman) cannot somehow put you in a better position to live the monastic life, let alone reap its benefits. That's like saying that keeping a piece of wood in the water for longer makes it easier to dry it out afterward. (See MN 36, wet wood simile).
The reason why older people could be more prepared for monastic life is Not because of the worldly and often unskillful experiences they've accumulated over the years, but rather because they sometimes (not always) have more perspective of their existence and of their dukkha (the basis for all Dhamma practice).
And that perspective is acquired through authentic and careful examination of one's perilous situation in saṃsāra, which often creates a certain anxiety (saṃvega, see below sutta), and this can make it feel like ordination is simply not optional. And if one remains heedful, that feeling would likely persist throught one's monastic life.
MN 29:
“...Bhikkhus, here some clansman goes forth out of faith from the home life into homelessness, considering: ‘I am a victim of birth, ageing, and death, of sorrow, lamentation, pain, grief, and despair; I am a victim of suffering, a prey to suffering. Surely an ending of this whole mass of suffering can be known...’"
If a young person can successfuly carry out that examination and take action early (i.e. ordain), the better off they will be without those additional wordly experiences, the majority of which would likely do little else than strengthen the very defilements that could one day press them to return to worldly life. Any practical advantages of a longer lay-life are trifle in light of that possible danger, Plus the billion things that could unexpectedly go wrong if a person decides to wait.
Last edited by ANG1509 on Sun Dec 05, 2021 4:46 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Re: Best age to be a monk?
ANG1509 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 4:33 pm It is wrong to think that a young person is by default less ready to dedicate themselves to the monk life. On the contrary: the younger a person is, the less rubbish they'll need to clear out from their mind before they can truly get started with the practice.
Spending more time in the world, especially if it involves doing things which contradict the ethos of a monastic (or worse, of a highly virtuous layman) cannot somehow put you in a better position to live the monastic life, let alone reap its benefits. That's like saying that keeping a piece of wood in the water for longer makes it easier to dry it out afterward. (See MN 36, wet wood simile).
The reason why older people could be more prepared for monastic life is Not because of the worldly and often unskillful experiences they've accumulated over the years, but rather because they sometimes (not always) have more perspective of their existence and of their dukkha (the basis for all Dhamma practice).
And that perspective is acquired through authentic and careful examination of one's perilous situation in saṃsāra, which often creates a certain anxiety (saṃvega, see below sutta), and this can make it feel like ordination is simply not optional. And if one remains heedful, that feeling would likely persist throught one's monastic life.
MN 29:
“...Bhikkhus, here some clansman goes forth out of faith from the home life into homelessness, considering: ‘I am a victim of birth, ageing, and death, of sorrow, lamentation, pain, grief, and despair; I am a victim of suffering, a prey to suffering. Surely an ending of this whole mass of suffering can be known...’"
If a young person can successfuly carry out that examination and take action early (i.e. ordain), the better off they will be without those additional wordly experiences, the majority of which would likely do little else than strengthen the very defilements that could one day press them to return to worldly life. Any practical advantages of a longer lay-life are trifle in light of that possible danger, Plus the billion things that could unexpectedly go wrong if a person decides to wait.
Thanks for the advice.
Hiriottappasampannā,
sukkadhammasamāhitā;
Santo sappurisā loke,
devadhammāti vuccare.
https://suttacentral.net/ja6/en/chalmer ... ight=false
sukkadhammasamāhitā;
Santo sappurisā loke,
devadhammāti vuccare.
https://suttacentral.net/ja6/en/chalmer ... ight=false
Re: Best age to be a monk?
70+ is good. You can study and meditate on your own. Save being a monk for when you are collecting a pension (or social security) and you don't have hormones anymore.
Re: Best age to be a monk?
I don't think the Sangha nowadays will receive such old man hahaha
Hiriottappasampannā,
sukkadhammasamāhitā;
Santo sappurisā loke,
devadhammāti vuccare.
https://suttacentral.net/ja6/en/chalmer ... ight=false
sukkadhammasamāhitā;
Santo sappurisā loke,
devadhammāti vuccare.
https://suttacentral.net/ja6/en/chalmer ... ight=false
- retrofuturist
- Posts: 27848
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Best age to be a monk?
Greetings,
Also, to become disenchanted, things need to lose their lustre. This won't necessarily happen merely by classifying them as 'forbidden fruit'.
Metta,
Paul.
Bhikkhu_Jayasara wrote: ↑Mon Nov 29, 2021 1:33 pm whatever age they develop enough wisdom and insight that will allow them to whether the ups and downs, stay ordained, and thrive in the holy life.
Also, to become disenchanted, things need to lose their lustre. This won't necessarily happen merely by classifying them as 'forbidden fruit'.
Metta,
Paul.
"Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things."