Booster dose

Some topics tend to get heated and go off track in unwholesome ways quite quickly. The "hot topics" sub-forum is a place where such topics may be moved so that each post must be manually approved by moderator before it will become visible to members.
Locked
User avatar
Mkoll
Posts: 6594
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2012 6:55 pm
Location: USA

Re: Booster dose

Post by Mkoll »

Dan74 wrote: Thu Jan 06, 2022 2:28 pm I hear the news reports repeat that boosters appear to be effective against hospitalisation, but have not looked at the evidence. Has anyone here looked at it carefully?
The hospital system I work for operates in a few metropolitan areas. They send out pretty regular updates about Covid. Here is a graphic from an update that was sent recently. I've cropped the image to protect my identity. The data covers a little less than two months.
Clipboard01 - Copy.jpg
Shouldn’t need much explanation.
mikenz66 wrote: Fri Jan 07, 2022 11:08 pmBut if the hospitals are overwhelmed in the process there will be a lot of unnecessary deaths, not just from Covid, but from lack of capacity that will lead to delays for all kinds of treatments for other conditions.
Yes, this is the case in the major metropolitan area I work in. We're setting records for the number of hospitalized Covid patients---the area hasn't seen this many at any time during the entire pandemic. Most hospitals in the area have cancelled all elective surgeries. My hospital has expanded the ICU into other units, turned multiple floors into pure Covid units, doubled up patients in rooms...basically everything that has happened before during prior peaks. This time, the ED is overflowing more than ever before because of the sheer number of people with Covid. Patients are spending days in the ED as boarders---that's what we call people who are have been selected to be admitted to the hospital, but there are just no staffed beds available for them so they stay in the ED.
mikenz66 wrote: Fri Jan 07, 2022 11:08 pmIf 0.1% of our population needed hospitalisation, for some reason, that would be 4,000 people. We have the order of 1000 beds in our hospitals.
The capacity number that really matters is staffed beds. A hospital bed is not helping anybody if there’s no staff to care for the patient that could be there. And at least in the United States, staffing was already a problem before the pandemic started. Now, it's beyond the pale with record numbers missing: out sick with Covid, quitting to make much more money travelling, quitting because they're close to retirement and now's as good a time as any, and just getting burned out and quitting for any number of other valid reasons.
Namo tassa bhagavato arahato samma sambuddhassa
Namo tassa bhagavato arahato samma sambuddhassa
Namo tassa bhagavato arahato samma sambuddhassa
User avatar
Sam Vara
Site Admin
Posts: 13590
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 5:42 pm
Location: Portsmouth, U.K.

Re: Booster dose

Post by Sam Vara »

Mkoll wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 4:19 pm...
Many thanks, Mkoll. I find that both clear and convincing. :anjali:
asahi
Posts: 2732
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2020 4:23 pm

Re: Booster dose

Post by asahi »

No airways
No pandemics worldwide :shrug:
No bashing No gossiping
thepea
Posts: 4123
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 11:06 pm

Re: Booster dose

Post by thepea »

Mkoll wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 4:19 pm
Dan74 wrote: Thu Jan 06, 2022 2:28 pm I hear the news reports repeat that boosters appear to be effective against hospitalisation, but have not looked at the evidence. Has anyone here looked at it carefully?
The hospital system I work for operates in a few metropolitan areas. They send out pretty regular updates about Covid. Here is a graphic from an update that was sent recently. I've cropped the image to protect my identity. The data covers a little less than two months.

Clipboard01 - Copy.jpg

Shouldn’t need much explanation.
mikenz66 wrote: Fri Jan 07, 2022 11:08 pmBut if the hospitals are overwhelmed in the process there will be a lot of unnecessary deaths, not just from Covid, but from lack of capacity that will lead to delays for all kinds of treatments for other conditions.
Yes, this is the case in the major metropolitan area I work in. We're setting records for the number of hospitalized Covid patients---the area hasn't seen this many at any time during the entire pandemic. Most hospitals in the area have cancelled all elective surgeries. My hospital has expanded the ICU into other units, turned multiple floors into pure Covid units, doubled up patients in rooms...basically everything that has happened before during prior peaks. This time, the ED is overflowing more than ever before because of the sheer number of people with Covid. Patients are spending days in the ED as boarders---that's what we call people who are have been selected to be admitted to the hospital, but there are just no staffed beds available for them so they stay in the ED.
mikenz66 wrote: Fri Jan 07, 2022 11:08 pmIf 0.1% of our population needed hospitalisation, for some reason, that would be 4,000 people. We have the order of 1000 beds in our hospitals.
The capacity number that really matters is staffed beds. A hospital bed is not helping anybody if there’s no staff to care for the patient that could be there. And at least in the United States, staffing was already a problem before the pandemic started. Now, it's beyond the pale with record numbers missing: out sick with Covid, quitting to make much more money travelling, quitting because they're close to retirement and now's as good a time as any, and just getting burned out and quitting for any number of other valid reasons.
What state are you in, Florida and Texas are wide open no issues there. They never really took any precautions.
SarathW
Posts: 21306
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 2:49 am

Re: Booster dose

Post by SarathW »

Sam Vara wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 4:49 pm
Mkoll wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 4:19 pm...
Many thanks, Mkoll. I find that both clear and convincing. :anjali:
Yes, they are good statistics but I just wonder it is biased towards the booster.
The only way to compare this is by comparing a sample of say 100 each with, not vaccinated, fully vaccinated, and fully vaccinated with a booster.
“As the lamp consumes oil, the path realises Nibbana”
User avatar
Sam Vara
Site Admin
Posts: 13590
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 5:42 pm
Location: Portsmouth, U.K.

Re: Booster dose

Post by Sam Vara »

SarathW wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 10:51 pm
Sam Vara wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 4:49 pm
Mkoll wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 4:19 pm...
Many thanks, Mkoll. I find that both clear and convincing. :anjali:
Yes, they are good statistics but I just wonder it is biased towards the booster.
The only way to compare this is by comparing a sample of say 100 each with, not vaccinated, fully vaccinated, and fully vaccinated with a booster.
Given that the percentage of USA fully vaccinated is above 60%, those stats are good enough for me. Only if the numbers were skewed the other way - more hospitalisation and deaths in the vaccinated - would it ring alarm bells.
thepea
Posts: 4123
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 11:06 pm

Re: Booster dose

Post by thepea »

SarathW wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 10:51 pm
Sam Vara wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 4:49 pm
Mkoll wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 4:19 pm...
Many thanks, Mkoll. I find that both clear and convincing. :anjali:
Yes, they are good statistics but I just wonder it is biased towards the booster.
The only way to compare this is by comparing a sample of say 100 each with, not vaccinated, fully vaccinated, and fully vaccinated with a booster.
What they need is categories
1.totally abstaining from vaccine
2.Took one vaccine but not considered vaccinated.
3.Took both vaccines but not 14 days so unvaccinated.
4. Took both vaccines but no booster so unvaccinated
5. Took both vaccines and considered vaccinated.
6. Took both vaccines plus booster so considered vaccinated.
There is a high percentage of population considered unvaccinated.
We cannot trust any numbers from biased sources such as hospitals as their agenda is to push vaccines.
[james]
Posts: 157
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2015 7:07 pm

Re: Booster dose

Post by [james] »

It may soon be necessary to add 7, 8, 9, etc. if the virus stays ahead of the boosters. The Canadian province where I reside is starting to muse out loud that compulsory vaccination may be required. I’ve had my two jabs plus booster but am beginning to doubt my willingness to continue. At what point does this virus become completely adapted to the vaccine?
User avatar
Ceisiwr
Posts: 22539
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:36 am

Re: Booster dose

Post by Ceisiwr »

[james] wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 1:56 am It may soon be necessary to add 7, 8, 9, etc. if the virus stays ahead of the boosters. The Canadian province where I reside is starting to muse out loud that compulsory vaccination may be required. I’ve had my two jabs plus booster but am beginning to doubt my willingness to continue. At what point does this virus become completely adapted to the vaccine?
Do you have this same concern about annual flu shots?
“Knowing that this body is just like foam,
understanding it has the nature of a mirage,
cutting off Māra’s flower-tipped arrows,
one should go beyond the King of Death’s sight.”
User avatar
Bhikkhu Pesala
Posts: 4647
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Booster dose

Post by Bhikkhu Pesala »

BBC News wrote:France is one of the most highly vaccinated countries in Europe, with more than 90% of over-12s eligible for the shot fully vaccinated.

Meanwhile, new coronavirus infections are rising rapidly across France as the new Omicron variant takes hold.

The country recorded more than 300,000 new cases for the second time in a week on Friday and admissions to intensive care wards are rising steadily, putting healthcare systems under strain.

Some hospitals have reported that some 85% of ICU patients are not vaccinated against Covid-19.
BlogPāli FontsIn This Very LifeBuddhist ChroniclesSoftware (Upasampadā: 24th June, 1979)
[james]
Posts: 157
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2015 7:07 pm

Re: Booster dose

Post by [james] »

Ceisiwr wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 2:14 am Do you have this same concern about annual flu shots?
I don’t take the annual flu shot. However, back when the pandemic was first starting I was quite ill in my lungs and decided to go ahead with the vaccine despite misgivings about the vaccine itself and the fear driven decision making that was (and continues to be) driving the pandemic response. I recognize the difficult situation that decision makers are in, but feel that much of the response continues to be less than fully considered.
Disciple
Posts: 513
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 9:13 pm

Re: Booster dose

Post by Disciple »

Two is enough for me. I think I read somewhere some countries are starting to give out the fourth shot.
User avatar
Dan74
Posts: 4541
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:12 pm
Location: Switzerland

Re: Booster dose

Post by Dan74 »

Sam Vara wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 10:58 pm
SarathW wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 10:51 pm
Sam Vara wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 4:49 pm

Many thanks, Mkoll. I find that both clear and convincing. :anjali:
Yes, they are good statistics but I just wonder it is biased towards the booster.
The only way to compare this is by comparing a sample of say 100 each with, not vaccinated, fully vaccinated, and fully vaccinated with a booster.
Given that the percentage of USA fully vaccinated is above 60%, those stats are good enough for me. Only if the numbers were skewed the other way - more hospitalisation and deaths in the vaccinated - would it ring alarm bells.
Exactly.

In fact, if that's taken into account and especially the fact that most hospitalizations are of the elderly where the percentage of the vaccinated is much higher, then the difference becomes even starker.

The only question mark in my mind is vaxxing kids. In the US 1.9 million kids 5-11 have tested positive, in reality many more have had covid since kids are mostly asymptomatic. Do you know how many deaths? Under 100. And that includes prior comorbidities. I might be wrong, but I don't see a convincing reason to vaxx this cohort. Unless there are significantly more long term effects.
_/|\_
User avatar
Dan74
Posts: 4541
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:12 pm
Location: Switzerland

Re: Booster dose

Post by Dan74 »

thepea wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 11:44 pm
SarathW wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 10:51 pm
Sam Vara wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 4:49 pm

Many thanks, Mkoll. I find that both clear and convincing. :anjali:
Yes, they are good statistics but I just wonder it is biased towards the booster.
The only way to compare this is by comparing a sample of say 100 each with, not vaccinated, fully vaccinated, and fully vaccinated with a booster.
What they need is categories
1.totally abstaining from vaccine
2.Took one vaccine but not considered vaccinated.
3.Took both vaccines but not 14 days so unvaccinated.
4. Took both vaccines but no booster so unvaccinated
5. Took both vaccines and considered vaccinated.
6. Took both vaccines plus booster so considered vaccinated.
There is a high percentage of population considered unvaccinated.
We cannot trust any numbers from biased sources such as hospitals as their agenda is to push vaccines.
Indeed one can only trust numbers from sources that align with one's opinions.
_/|\_
thepea
Posts: 4123
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 11:06 pm

Re: Booster dose

Post by thepea »

Ceisiwr wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 2:14 am
[james] wrote: Sun Jan 09, 2022 1:56 am It may soon be necessary to add 7, 8, 9, etc. if the virus stays ahead of the boosters. The Canadian province where I reside is starting to muse out loud that compulsory vaccination may be required. I’ve had my two jabs plus booster but am beginning to doubt my willingness to continue. At what point does this virus become completely adapted to the vaccine?
Do you have this same concern about annual flu shots?
I’ve never ever taken a flu shot.
Locked