Are Samsara and the Nibbana the two sides of the same coin?
Sri Lankan monk made the above statement.
What is your opinion?
Are Samsara and the Nibbana the two sides of the same coin?
Are Samsara and the Nibbana the two sides of the same coin?
“As the lamp consumes oil, the path realises Nibbana”
Re: Are Samsara and the Nibbana the two sides of the same coin?
Theravāda says no, they are distinct. Ven. Nāgārjuna says yes. Nibbāna is Saṃsāra correctly viewed, i.e. as empty.
“Knowing that this body is just like foam,
understanding it has the nature of a mirage,
cutting off Māra’s flower-tipped arrows,
one should go beyond the King of Death’s sight.”
understanding it has the nature of a mirage,
cutting off Māra’s flower-tipped arrows,
one should go beyond the King of Death’s sight.”
-
- Posts: 714
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2021 4:40 am
Re: Are Samsara and the Nibbana the two sides of the same coin?
There is merit in this statement imo.
I think, from samsara to nibbana, nothing is added, nothing is throw away, merely motion differentiates them.
I think, from samsara to nibbana, nothing is added, nothing is throw away, merely motion differentiates them.
-
- Posts: 1067
- Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2021 7:39 am
Re: Are Samsara and the Nibbana the two sides of the same coin?
Very misleading and delusional statement by Nagarjuna.
Samsara is conditioned and dependently arisen.
Nibbana is the unconditioned and independent.
"Therein monks, that Dimension should be known wherein the eye ceases and the perception of forms fades away...the ear... the nose...the tongue... the body ceases and the perception of touch fades away...
That Dimension should be known wherein mentality ceases and the perception of mind-objects fades away.
That Dimension should be known; that Dimension should be known."
(S. IV. 98) - The Dimension beyond the All
That Dimension should be known wherein mentality ceases and the perception of mind-objects fades away.
That Dimension should be known; that Dimension should be known."
(S. IV. 98) - The Dimension beyond the All
Re: Are Samsara and the Nibbana the two sides of the same coin?
Hi SarathW,
Like what Ceisiwr said; Therevada doesn't. Nagarjuna and anyone who holds a similar perspective, can see it like that. Samsara being not understanding DO, and Nibbana being understanding DO.
Can you give me the name of this monk?
Re: Are Samsara and the Nibbana the two sides of the same coin?
Depends on what the monk meant with that "two sides of the same coin"? Was it simply a colloquial expression of opposites, like night vs day, hot vs cold, etc? then there's no problem. Was it a technical expression? then the problem lies at the "same coin" part cuz Samsara is conditioned while Nibbana is unconditioned, they don't share the same nature, hence they're not of the "same coin".SarathW wrote:Are Samsara and the Nibbana the two sides of the same coin?
Sri Lankan monk made the above statement.
What is your opinion?
- DNS
- Site Admin
- Posts: 17187
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:15 am
- Location: Las Vegas, Nevada, Estados Unidos de América
- Contact:
Re: Are Samsara and the Nibbana the two sides of the same coin?
As others have noted, that's more of a Mahayana teaching. They also use that phrase to refer to enlightened living, helping others on the path to nirvana, thus, in samsara and also nirvana (sort of) when they attain high levels of awakening but do not cease rebirth.
Re: Are Samsara and the Nibbana the two sides of the same coin?
I wouldn’t say it’s strictly a Mahāyāna view. I don’t think you have to be a Mahāyānist to agree with Ven. Nāgārjuna.DNS wrote: ↑Thu Jan 27, 2022 3:44 pm As others have noted, that's more of a Mahayana teaching. They also use that phrase to refer to enlightened living, helping others on the path to nirvana, thus, in samsara and also nirvana (sort of) when they attain high levels of awakening but do not cease rebirth.
“Knowing that this body is just like foam,
understanding it has the nature of a mirage,
cutting off Māra’s flower-tipped arrows,
one should go beyond the King of Death’s sight.”
understanding it has the nature of a mirage,
cutting off Māra’s flower-tipped arrows,
one should go beyond the King of Death’s sight.”
Re: Are Samsara and the Nibbana the two sides of the same coin?
Nibbana is when there is no coin.
Re: Are Samsara and the Nibbana the two sides of the same coin?
I will go even further and say that any path or practice is not what Nagarjuna expounded, as he made it clear, at least tried to make it clear, that everything is empty of substance. By saying that there is a certain path or practice to attain Nibbana, one is giving this path or practice substance, which is therefore contraproductive in getting to the insight that everything is empty.Ceisiwr wrote: ↑Thu Jan 27, 2022 5:20 pmI wouldn’t say it’s strictly a Mahāyāna view. I don’t think you have to be a Mahāyānist to agree with Ven. Nāgārjuna.DNS wrote: ↑Thu Jan 27, 2022 3:44 pm As others have noted, that's more of a Mahayana teaching. They also use that phrase to refer to enlightened living, helping others on the path to nirvana, thus, in samsara and also nirvana (sort of) when they attain high levels of awakening but do not cease rebirth.
Re: Are Samsara and the Nibbana the two sides of the same coin?
This is nonsense.PeterC86 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 27, 2022 7:31 pmI will go even further and say that any path or practice is not what Nagarjuna expounded, as he made it clear, at least tried to make it clear, that everything is empty of substance. By saying that there is a certain path or practice to attain Nibbana, one is giving this path or practice substance, which is therefore contraproductive in getting to the insight that everything is empty.Ceisiwr wrote: ↑Thu Jan 27, 2022 5:20 pmI wouldn’t say it’s strictly a Mahāyāna view. I don’t think you have to be a Mahāyānist to agree with Ven. Nāgārjuna.DNS wrote: ↑Thu Jan 27, 2022 3:44 pm As others have noted, that's more of a Mahayana teaching. They also use that phrase to refer to enlightened living, helping others on the path to nirvana, thus, in samsara and also nirvana (sort of) when they attain high levels of awakening but do not cease rebirth.
“Knowing that this body is just like foam,
understanding it has the nature of a mirage,
cutting off Māra’s flower-tipped arrows,
one should go beyond the King of Death’s sight.”
understanding it has the nature of a mirage,
cutting off Māra’s flower-tipped arrows,
one should go beyond the King of Death’s sight.”
Re: Are Samsara and the Nibbana the two sides of the same coin?
Many here would agree with you, so you're in the right place regarding that.Cause_and_Effect wrote: ↑Thu Jan 27, 2022 2:42 pmVery misleading and delusional statement by Nagarjuna.
“Knowing that this body is just like foam,
understanding it has the nature of a mirage,
cutting off Māra’s flower-tipped arrows,
one should go beyond the King of Death’s sight.”
understanding it has the nature of a mirage,
cutting off Māra’s flower-tipped arrows,
one should go beyond the King of Death’s sight.”
Re: Are Samsara and the Nibbana the two sides of the same coin?
Indeed it is. Everything I say is nonsense. Just as you are talking nonsense, and everybody else is talking nonsense. Words are merely understood in the subjective mind and have no inherent essence. Therefore, logic and reasoning are also empty of any essence. It is merely through our linguistical cognition that we are to communicate through conscensus as to what words mean. Also this conscensus is subjective. So through reasoning, we can communicate that everything, including reasoning itself, is empty, without giving reasoning any substance. Furthermore, if logic and reasoning were not empty, then there would be a metaphysical truth one could arrive at.Ceisiwr wrote: ↑Thu Jan 27, 2022 7:38 pmThis is nonsense.PeterC86 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 27, 2022 7:31 pmI will go even further and say that any path or practice is not what Nagarjuna expounded, as he made it clear, at least tried to make it clear, that everything is empty of substance. By saying that there is a certain path or practice to attain Nibbana, one is giving this path or practice substance, which is therefore contraproductive in getting to the insight that everything is empty.
Therefore, nothing being said or thought anywhere holds any real truth. And therefore, any path or practice said or written about as a way of getting to this understanding is also nonsense. Let alone such a path or practice actually being followed, as they are, like I said, even counterproductive to get this insight, because they are based on nonsense. So yes, Nagarjuna explains a non-way, and most people don't get that.
Normally I don't respond to such a hollow post, but this was also to tell you; you're not quite there kid. Goodbye.
Re: Are Samsara and the Nibbana the two sides of the same coin?
Words being empty doesn't mean they do not carry meaning. You yourself just understood what I wrote, despite words being empty. Look, you are doing it again! Ven. Nāgārjuna never denounced the use of concepts. Concepts are useful. The problem is when we breathe life into them, so to speak. That is what Ven. Nāgārjuna was addressing. If concepts are useless, why did the Buddha teach at all?PeterC86 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 27, 2022 8:41 pm
Indeed it is. Everything I say is nonsense. Just as you are talking nonsense, and everybody else is talking nonsense. Words are merely understood in the subjective mind and have no inherent essence. Therefore, logic and reasoning are also empty of any essence. It is merely through our linguistical cognition that we are to communicate through conscensus as to what words mean. Also this conscensus is subjective. So through reasoning, we can communicate that everything, including reasoning itself, is empty, without giving reasoning any substance. Furthermore, if logic and reasoning were not empty, then there would be a metaphysical truth one could arrive at.
Therefore, nothing being said or thought anywhere holds any real truth. And therefore, any path or practice said or written about as a way of getting to this understanding is also nonsense. Let alone such a path or practice actually being followed, as they are, like I said, even counterproductive to get this insight, because they are based on nonsense. So yes, Nagarjuna explains a non-way, and most people don't get that.
Normally I don't respond to such a hollow post, but this was also to tell you; you're not quite there kid. Goodbye.
“Knowing that this body is just like foam,
understanding it has the nature of a mirage,
cutting off Māra’s flower-tipped arrows,
one should go beyond the King of Death’s sight.”
understanding it has the nature of a mirage,
cutting off Māra’s flower-tipped arrows,
one should go beyond the King of Death’s sight.”