If life is suffering, then wouldn't it be unethical to have children?
Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 3:36 am
Wouldn't that be bringing a child into an existence which is suffering?
A Buddhist discussion forum on the Dhamma of Theravāda Buddhism
https://www.dhammawheel.com/
In five ways, young householder, the parents thus ministered to as the East by their children, show their compassion:
(i) they restrain them from evil,
(ii) they encourage them to do good,
(iii) they train them for a profession,
(iv) they arrange a suitable marriage,
(v) at the proper time they hand over their inheritance to them.
Sigalovada Sutta
A sacrament is a Christian rite recognised as of particular importance and significance.
1 Corinthians 7:8 Now to the unmarried and the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried...
Matthew 19:10 The disciples said to him, "If this is the situation between a husband and wife, it is better not to marry."
Celibacy- is marriage obligatory in Judaism?
All Jewish men are obligated to marry because they need it both physiologically and spiritually in order to keep them focused on life itself (rather than being preoccupied with their sexual gratification).... This clearly set the tone and norm for the family life which is so basic and elementary to anyone who knows anything about Judaism (the celibacy found in the Essene, Catholic and other religions was always mocked and ridiculed by Judaism as if inferring that a perfect God “made a mistake” (!) when He created the exceptional attraction between men and women!).
http://www.yeshiva.co/ask/?id=7302
Then why don't arahants & other enlightened Buddhists have children?
Where does Dhamma say this?
This is the best of gifts: the gift of Dhamma. And this is the best of friendly speech: to teach again and again Dhamma to those who wish for it and who listen attentively. And this is the best of helpful acts: to arouse, instil and strengthen faith in the unbeliever; to arouse, instil and strengthen virtue in the immoral; to arouse, instil and strengthen generosity in the niggard; to arouse, instil and strengthen wisdom in the unwise. And this is the best bestowal of equity: if a stream-winner becomes equal to a stream-winner; a once-returner equal to a once-returner; a non-returner equal to a non-returner; and an arahant equal to an arahant. AN 9.5
A widow is someone who was married, it is just that her husband happened to have passed away. Full context of that passage here:
Full context of that passage:Matthew 19:10 The disciples said to him, "If this is the situation between a husband and wife, it is better not to marry."
Your liberation come first.DooDoot wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 4:22 amThen why don't arahants & other enlightened Buddhists have children?
Where does Dhamma say this?
This is the best of gifts: the gift of Dhamma. And this is the best of friendly speech: to teach again and again Dhamma to those who wish for it and who listen attentively. And this is the best of helpful acts: to arouse, instil and strengthen faith in the unbeliever; to arouse, instil and strengthen virtue in the immoral; to arouse, instil and strengthen generosity in the niggard; to arouse, instil and strengthen wisdom in the unwise. And this is the best bestowal of equity: if a stream-winner becomes equal to a stream-winner; a once-returner equal to a once-returner; a non-returner equal to a non-returner; and an arahant equal to an arahant. AN 9.5
Revelation 14.4
These are those who did not defile themselves with women, for they remained virgins. They follow the Lamb wherever he goes. They were purchased from among mankind and offered as firstfruits to God and the Lamb. 5 No lie was found in their mouths; they are blameless.
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?s ... ersion=NIV
7 billion homo sapiens on earth does not appear rare. But living 'humanely' according to the Dhamma seems rare.
Sooner, I say, would that blind turtle, coming to the surface once every hundred years, insert its neck into that yoke with a single hole than the fool who has gone once to the nether world would regain the human state. For what reason? Because here, bhikkhus, there is no conduct guided by the Dhamma, no righteous conduct, no wholesome activity, no meritorious activity. Here there prevails mutual devouring, the devouring of the weak. For what reason? Because, bhikkhus, they have not seen the Four Noble Truths. What four? The noble truth of suffering … the noble truth of the way leading to the cessation of suffering.
https://suttacentral.net/en/sn56.47
Definitely not sexual intercourse, procreation & reproduction...
Then the Gracious One after seeing that the Koliyan lady Suppavāsā was elated, gladdened, joyful and happy, said this to the Koliyan lady Suppavāsā: “Suppavāsā, do you long for another such son?”
“Gracious One, I long for another seven such sons.” Then the Gracious One, having understood the significance of it, on that occasion uttered this exalted utterance:
“The disagreeable in an agreeable form, the unlovely in a lovely form,
The painful in the form of pleasure, overcome the heedless one.”
https://suttacentral.net/en/ud2.8
Again, you left out the context, that this passage was referring to the 12,000 that are to be saved from each tribe (according to Christianity):DooDoot wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 4:43 am Revelation 14.4
These are those who did not defile themselves with women, for they remained virgins. They follow the Lamb wherever he goes. They were purchased from among mankind and offered as firstfruits to God and the Lamb. 5 No lie was found in their mouths; they are blameless.
Zebulon
Galatians 3:28 - There is neither Jew nor Gentile....for you are all one in Christ Jesus.
Revelations comes after Galatians, so Revelations trumps...Galatians 3:28 - There is neither Jew nor Gentile....
I need proof, I need to see some genetic evidence.