Third precept
Third precept
Is there stated in vinaya lay people prohibited from engage in oral sex , masturbation and frequenting prostitute if not married or even they already married ?
You always gain by giving
Re: Third precept
The vinaya is the rules and procedures governing the monastic sangha, so wouldn't deal with this sort of thing. Are there other areas of the vinaya that relate to the private behaviour of married people? I've not heard of any such proscription in any part of the tipitaka, although there are obviously teachings relating to sensuality in general.
Re: Third precept
I was thinking of other related information about it probably someone might have the knowledge .Sam Vara wrote: ↑Wed Oct 09, 2019 9:52 am The vinaya is the rules and procedures governing the monastic sangha, so wouldn't deal with this sort of thing. Are there other areas of the vinaya that relate to the private behaviour of married people? I've not heard of any such proscription in any part of the tipitaka, although there are obviously teachings relating to sensuality in general.
Thanks
You always gain by giving
- salayatananirodha
- Posts: 1479
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2018 1:34 am
- Contact:
Re: Third precept
I host a sutta discussion via Zoom Sundays at 11AM Chicago time — message me if you are interested
Re: Third precept
Do a search in this Sila forum for the word "sexual" and it will point you to a great variety of posts dealing with these issues.
EDIT:......or more specifically directed to the specific ideas you present in the OP I suggest searching for "oral".
chownah
EDIT:......or more specifically directed to the specific ideas you present in the OP I suggest searching for "oral".
chownah
Re: Third precept
Buddhism and Sex
we must distinguish between the rules undertaken by Buddhist monks for their own conduct, and any guiding principles for lay people.
https://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/aut ... el225.html
we must distinguish between the rules undertaken by Buddhist monks for their own conduct, and any guiding principles for lay people.
https://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/aut ... el225.html
“As the lamp consumes oil, the path realises Nibbana”
Re: Third precept
What is the meaning of woman protected by dhamma ?salayatananirodha wrote: ↑Wed Oct 09, 2019 6:30 pm www.buddha-vacana.org/sutta/anguttara/1 ... micchacara
You always gain by giving
- Dhammanando
- Posts: 6492
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:44 pm
- Location: Mae Wang Huai Rin, Li District, Lamphun
Re: Third precept
Women keeping brahmacarī vows (i.e., bhikkhunīs, sāmaṇerīs, sikkhamānās and eight-precept upāsikās) and (in later texts) consanguineous female relatives.
Yena yena hi maññanti,
tato taṃ hoti aññathā.
In whatever way they conceive it,
It turns out otherwise.
(Sn. 588)
tato taṃ hoti aññathā.
In whatever way they conceive it,
It turns out otherwise.
(Sn. 588)
Re: Third precept
Thanks venerable , why is it women liable to punishment is in the protected category ?Dhammanando wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 3:33 pmWomen keeping brahmacarī vows (i.e., bhikkhunīs, sāmaṇerīs, sikkhamānās and eight-precept upāsikās) and (in later texts) consanguineous female relatives.
And did the Buddha ever mentioned about other than Protected candidate concerning lay people sexual misconduct behavior that would violate third precept , is there anything about how lay people should or shouldn't acts in the intimacy relationship that violates the third precept ?
You always gain by giving
- Dhammanando
- Posts: 6492
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:44 pm
- Location: Mae Wang Huai Rin, Li District, Lamphun
Re: Third precept
That's just a poor translation. A saparidaṇḍā isn't a "woman liable to punishment", but rather a "woman in connection with whom a punishment has been set." The Vinaya defines the term as: "a girl who's been promised to someone, whose name has been put on a public notice set up in a village, house, or street announcing a penalty for anyone who goes to her."
The early texts don't go further than specifying the kind of sexual partners who are off limits. The specifications taught by some Mahayana teachers regarding appropriate and inappropriate methods and orifices, right and wrong places and times, etc., all come from very late texts and aren't found in any Theravadin sources at all. The East Asians usually get them from the Upāsakaśīla Sūtra and the Tibetans from Vaśubandhu's auto-commentary to the Abhidharmakośa.sentinel wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 4:36 pmAnd did the Buddha ever mentioned about other than Protected candidate concerning lay people sexual misconduct behavior that would violate third precept , is there anything about how lay people should or shouldn't acts in the intimacy relationship that violates the third precept ?
Yena yena hi maññanti,
tato taṃ hoti aññathā.
In whatever way they conceive it,
It turns out otherwise.
(Sn. 588)
tato taṃ hoti aññathā.
In whatever way they conceive it,
It turns out otherwise.
(Sn. 588)
Re: Third precept
Thanks venerable .Dhammanando wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2019 7:32 amThat's just a poor translation. A saparidaṇḍā isn't a "woman liable to punishment", but rather a "woman in connection with whom a punishment has been set." The Vinaya defines the term as: "a girl who's been promised to someone, whose name has been put on a public notice set up in a village, house, or street announcing a penalty for anyone who goes to her."
The early texts don't go further than specifying the kind of sexual partners who are off limits. The specifications taught by some Mahayana teachers regarding appropriate and inappropriate methods and orifices, right and wrong places and times, etc., all come from very late texts and aren't found in any Theravadin sources at all. The East Asians usually get them from the Upāsakaśīla Sūtra and the Tibetans from Vaśubandhu's auto-commentary to the Abhidharmakośa.sentinel wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 4:36 pmAnd did the Buddha ever mentioned about other than Protected candidate concerning lay people sexual misconduct behavior that would violate third precept , is there anything about how lay people should or shouldn't acts in the intimacy relationship that violates the third precept ?
You always gain by giving