Not much of an argument. The subject is not straightforward.
And those who do not act wisely reap the fruits also.
Naeglria fowleri - 'the brain eating parasite'.
https://www.cdc.gov/parasites/naegleria/index.html
A very high fatality rate of 95%
There is a small chance of documented survival if treatement is sought taking antifungal drugs which kill the parasite. To not do so is certain death.
The dhamma is not designed to create fools who would so cursorily throw away their lives due to mistakenly taking precepts as commandments to be followed absolutely in place of reason and circumstance.
"When — by following a life of precept & practice, a life, a holy life that is followed as of essential worth — one's unskillful mental qualities increase while one's skillful mental qualities decline: that sort of precept & practice, life, holy life that is followed as of essential worth is fruitless. But when — by following a life of precept & practice, a life, a holy life that is followed as of essential worth — one's unskillful mental qualities decline while one's skillful mental qualities increase: that sort of precept & practice, life, holy life that is followed as of essential worth is fruitful."
https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitak ... .than.html
The human birth is rare, and the chance to practice dhamma rarer.
The wise decision to preserve one life by seeking treatment when there are no other options even though it involves killing the parasite is the correct one and aligned with the dhamma, to prevent the destruction of one's own life and allow one to continue to live a dhamma life.
To foolishly allow one's own human life to perish for the sake of the lethal parasite would be grasping wrongly to precepts with no wisdom factor, and nothing more than a manifestation of gross ignorance in such a case.