this translation of the fifth precept is wrong, i think, and i suspect that it causes a lot of harm.
the three terms surā, meraya and majja/pa pertain to alcohol, from what i've read.
i think it's possible that saints, at least stream-winners, may use drugs.
a lot of drugs in the world have medical indications, which are largely unknown in the modern, western world due to the war on drugs. even if a person is not prescribed such things they might use them in a 'self-medicating' way.
alcohol is one drug that is socially tolerated but has few if any legitimate medical uses.
you might say that intention matters, but its possible still to get drunk or tipsy even if you drink alcohol with the intention to use it as medicine. the development of that is blameworthy.
i dont know that the precept exclusively pertains to use of alcohol, but its quite a leap to include all drug use.
do you think there is more nuance to the fifth precept than contemporary translators reveal?
if it is that not all drug use falls under the fifth precept, then if a person might excessively blame himself or herself for using such drugs - or drugs in such a way - that fall outside of that
thereby mistaking less essential things for more essential things
'drink and drugs that cause carelessness'
- salayatananirodha
- Posts: 1479
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2018 1:34 am
- Contact:
'drink and drugs that cause carelessness'
I host a sutta discussion via Zoom Sundays at 11AM Chicago time — message me if you are interested
- salayatananirodha
- Posts: 1479
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2018 1:34 am
- Contact:
Re: 'drink and drugs that cause carelessness'
i wish to enter this into evidence but without detracting from the original topic - this is not about what stream enterers are unlikely, but capable, of doing but what they might perhaps have a good chance of doing (even if it is blameworthy)
https://meditationexplorer.files.wordpr ... sion-2.pdf
https://meditationexplorer.files.wordpr ... sion-2.pdf
I host a sutta discussion via Zoom Sundays at 11AM Chicago time — message me if you are interested
- salayatananirodha
- Posts: 1479
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2018 1:34 am
- Contact:
Re: 'drink and drugs that cause carelessness'
it has to be a thing specific to this precept that is a basis of negligence, since there are other things that are bases of negligence that are covered under other rules and observances, such as watching movies, plays and sports, listening to music and playing games; see seventh precept
I host a sutta discussion via Zoom Sundays at 11AM Chicago time — message me if you are interested
- salayatananirodha
- Posts: 1479
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2018 1:34 am
- Contact:
Re: 'drink and drugs that cause carelessness'
one thing comparable to this is how the river valley sangha includes environmentalism in their rendering of the first precept
perhaps an obvious overreach to us theravadins
i view this similarly but subtler
perhaps an obvious overreach to us theravadins
i view this similarly but subtler
I host a sutta discussion via Zoom Sundays at 11AM Chicago time — message me if you are interested
- salayatananirodha
- Posts: 1479
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2018 1:34 am
- Contact:
Re: 'drink and drugs that cause carelessness'
me, i like to drink energy drinks and other caffeinated beverages
there is a definite sensual effect that i am seeking
but is this a basis of negligence in accordance with the fifth precept?
i dont think it is
a lot of why people include 'all drugs' is due to the war on drugs* *a history of demonization of illicit substances by government and elite social classes
there is a definite sensual effect that i am seeking
but is this a basis of negligence in accordance with the fifth precept?
i dont think it is
a lot of why people include 'all drugs' is due to the war on drugs* *a history of demonization of illicit substances by government and elite social classes
I host a sutta discussion via Zoom Sundays at 11AM Chicago time — message me if you are interested
- salayatananirodha
- Posts: 1479
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2018 1:34 am
- Contact:
Re: 'drink and drugs that cause carelessness'
i would literally say its possible for a stream enterer to have a crystal meth or a heroin addiction
but #changemymind
but #changemymind
I host a sutta discussion via Zoom Sundays at 11AM Chicago time — message me if you are interested
Re: 'drink and drugs that cause carelessness'
stream-winners cannot have 'downfall'salayatananirodha wrote: ↑Sun Apr 11, 2021 7:29 pm i think it's possible that saints, at least stream-winners, may use drugs.
intoxicants lead to 'downfall'
To be a rake, a drunkard, a gambler, and to squander all one earns — this is a cause of one's downfall.
Not to be contented with one's own wife, and to be seen with harlots and the wives of others [or if gay, is similarly sexually promiscuous] — this is a cause of one's downfall.
Parabhava Sutta: Downfall
salayatananirodha wrote: ↑Sun Apr 11, 2021 8:14 pm i would literally say its possible for a stream enterer to have a crystal meth or a heroin addiction
Now at that time a baby boy was lying face-up on the prince's lap. So the Blessed One said to the prince, "What do you think, prince: If this young boy, through your own negligence or that of the nurse, were to take a stick or a piece of gravel into its mouth, what would you do?"
"I would take it out, lord. If I couldn't get it out right away, then holding its head in my left hand and crooking a finger of my right, I would take it out, even if it meant drawing blood. Why is that? Because I have sympathy for the young boy."
MN 58
There is always an official executioner. If you try to take his place, It is like trying to be a master carpenter and cutting wood. If you try to cut wood like a master carpenter, you will only hurt your hand.
https://soundcloud.com/doodoot/paticcasamuppada
https://soundcloud.com/doodoot/anapanasati
https://soundcloud.com/doodoot/paticcasamuppada
https://soundcloud.com/doodoot/anapanasati
- JamesTheGiant
- Posts: 2147
- Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2015 8:41 am
- Location: New Zealand
Re: 'drink and drugs that cause carelessness'
Yes it's a topic worth some personal reflection. Unfortunately it often causes argument in online discussions, as we will probably see soon.
Certainly at the time of the Buddha there were some drugs available in north India, including psiloycbin (soma?), cannabis, and opium. It's interesting he didn't mention them explicitly in any teachings.
Certainly at the time of the Buddha there were some drugs available in north India, including psiloycbin (soma?), cannabis, and opium. It's interesting he didn't mention them explicitly in any teachings.
- pitithefool
- Posts: 343
- Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2021 5:39 am
Re: 'drink and drugs that cause carelessness'
DooDoot wrote: ↑Sun Apr 11, 2021 9:28 pm stream-winners cannot have 'downfall'
intoxicants lead to 'downfall'
Food for thought.To be a rake, a drunkard, a gambler, and to squander all one earns — this is a cause of one's downfall.
The canon defines the "intoxicant" rule as "fermented drinks which cause heedlessness".
Do fermented drinks always cause heedlessness?
If one takes a drink for the purpose of social interaction and it doesn't lead to harm, are they in decline?
Please note: This profile picture is not actually a picture of the user.
- salayatananirodha
- Posts: 1479
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2018 1:34 am
- Contact:
Re: 'drink and drugs that cause carelessness'
no, i dont think so, but it's a slippery slope. but no, i dont think if a person has one single drink appropriate to their body weight, not for the purpose of becoming intoxicated, and they dont become intoxicated, that they are violating the fifth precept in a meaningful way.pitithefool wrote: ↑Sun Apr 11, 2021 11:32 pmFood for thought.To be a rake, a drunkard, a gambler, and to squander all one earns — this is a cause of one's downfall.
The canon defines the "intoxicant" rule as "fermented drinks which cause heedlessness".
Do fermented drinks always cause heedlessness?
If one takes a drink for the purpose of social interaction and it doesn't lead to harm, are they in decline?
there was a forum member on here who i thought made a good argument: viewtopic.php?p=37437#p37437
in summary, it's the negligence from the intoxicants that is to be abstained from rather than the substances themselves.
i would like to revise one comment i made and say perhaps a stream enterer could or would not have an 'addiction' to crystal meth or heroin but they could perhaps have a habit of using those drugs. i currently dont see much reason to believe otherwise except that these substances are taboo. and there is a limit to the suffering they can experience. and it might not be a common thing at all.
I host a sutta discussion via Zoom Sundays at 11AM Chicago time — message me if you are interested
Re: 'drink and drugs that cause carelessness'
The precept is don't drink. It isn't don't drink too much. A sip is a violation of the precept if made intentionally.salayatananirodha wrote: ↑Sun Apr 11, 2021 11:56 pm no, i dont think so, but it's a slippery slope. but no, i dont think if a person has one single drink appropriate to their body weight, not for the purpose of becoming intoxicated, and they dont become intoxicated, that they are violating the fifth precept in a meaningful way.
...
Namo Tassa Bhagavato Arahato Sammā Sambuddhassa
Re: 'drink and drugs that cause carelessness'
Best to not encourage those who appear to claim they are a stream-enterer yet appear still doing drugs. This path is common to these types of chatsites; where addicts claim attainments arising from reading jargon in books. Try to have compassion &/or equanimity but don't feed addicts their follies. The Buddha said vice is a downfall; resulting in 'eons' in 'hell'. It is not easy to resurrect from the spiritual 'death' of vice. Addicts who get inspired by the dhamma but attain no fruit are a dime a dozen. They come & go, frequently. Buddhism is not Christianity. There is no magical salvation via faith in Buddhism.pitithefool wrote: ↑Sun Apr 11, 2021 11:32 pm The canon defines the "intoxicant" rule as "fermented drinks which cause heedlessness".
Do fermented drinks always cause heedlessness?
I see my fall in your eyes,
The streams of the rain,
I see blue green butterflies
But I feel no pain,
I see the leaves of the life
Twirling in the wind
Again, and again.
There is always an official executioner. If you try to take his place, It is like trying to be a master carpenter and cutting wood. If you try to cut wood like a master carpenter, you will only hurt your hand.
https://soundcloud.com/doodoot/paticcasamuppada
https://soundcloud.com/doodoot/anapanasati
https://soundcloud.com/doodoot/paticcasamuppada
https://soundcloud.com/doodoot/anapanasati
Re: 'drink and drugs that cause carelessness'
Given they are something an individual takes on voluntarily, I see little point in arguing legalistically about the lay precepts. It's not as if you're going to be kicked out of Buddhism over your interpretation of the precepts.salayatananirodha wrote: ↑Sun Apr 11, 2021 11:56 pm no, i dont think so, but it's a slippery slope. but no, i dont think if a person has one single drink appropriate to their body weight, not for the purpose of becoming intoxicated, and they dont become intoxicated, that they are violating the fifth precept in a meaningful way.
...
Personally, I find almost any amount of alcohol affects the clarity of my mind and, frankly, makes me feel bad, so I try to avoid it. Occasionally, I choose to sip on a drink, or eat a dessert containing alcohol, out of politeness. These are the sort of personal choices one has to make...
Mike
- salayatananirodha
- Posts: 1479
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2018 1:34 am
- Contact:
Re: 'drink and drugs that cause carelessness'
Best to not encourage those who appear to claim they are a stream-enterer yet appear still doing drugs. This path is common to these types of chatsites; where addicts claim attainments arising from reading jargon in books. Try to have compassion &/or equanimity but don't feed addicts their follies. The Buddha said vice is a downfall; resulting in 'eons' in 'hell'. It is not easy to resurrect from the spiritual 'death' of vice. Addicts who get inspired by the dhamma but attain no fruit are a dime a dozen. They come & go, frequently. Buddhism is not Christianity. There is no magical salvation via faith in Buddhism.pitithefool wrote: ↑Sun Apr 11, 2021 11:32 pm The canon defines the "intoxicant" rule as "fermented drinks which cause heedlessness".
Do fermented drinks always cause heedlessness?
and many similar declarations occur in suttas; for example https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitak ... .than.htmlhttps://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn55/sn55.024.wlsh.html wrote:"Take the case of another man. He is not even endowed with unwavering devotion to the Buddha, the Dhamma, the Sangha. He is not joyous and swift in wisdom and has not gained release. But he has just these things: the faculty of faith, of energy, of mindfulness, of concentration, of wisdom. Yet if he has merely faith, merely affection for the Tathaagata, that man, too, does not go to... states of woe.
so you really dont have to be near-perfect to attain the fruit of stream winning. even 'addicts' can get a foot in the door.
i too completely abstain from alcohol but there could be some situation where perhaps i would not but would still not pursue intoxication. this topic is important for the delineation of things that are of great blame and things that are of little blame (be they blameable still). it's easy to blame ariyans for things by wrongly understanding the difference.Given they are something an individual takes on voluntarily, I see little point in arguing legalistically about the lay precepts. It's not as if you're going to be kicked out of Buddhism over your interpretation of the precepts.salayatananirodha wrote: ↑Sun Apr 11, 2021 11:56 pm no, i dont think so, but it's a slippery slope. but no, i dont think if a person has one single drink appropriate to their body weight, not for the purpose of becoming intoxicated, and they dont become intoxicated, that they are violating the fifth precept in a meaningful way.
...
Personally, I find almost any amount of alcohol affects the clarity of my mind and, frankly, makes me feel bad, so I try to avoid it. Occasionally, I choose to sip on a drink, or eat a dessert containing alcohol, out of politeness. These are the sort of personal choices one has to make...
that is one common interpretation, yes.mjaviem wrote: ↑Mon Apr 12, 2021 12:30 amThe precept is don't drink. It isn't don't drink too much. A sip is a violation of the precept if made intentionally.salayatananirodha wrote: ↑Sun Apr 11, 2021 11:56 pm no, i dont think so, but it's a slippery slope. but no, i dont think if a person has one single drink appropriate to their body weight, not for the purpose of becoming intoxicated, and they dont become intoxicated, that they are violating the fifth precept in a meaningful way.
...
I host a sutta discussion via Zoom Sundays at 11AM Chicago time — message me if you are interested
- pitithefool
- Posts: 343
- Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2021 5:39 am
Re: 'drink and drugs that cause carelessness'
Who is claiming stream entry here?
And yes, vice obviously leads to a bad destination.
Couple more questions: (I'm playing devil's advocate)
Are there any circumstances in which a person firmly established in sila ought to drink a fermented drink? I.e. a situation in which not doing so would lead to the harm of oneself and/or others?
What about the other precepts, too? DD, you've argued that it's OK to kill parasites. Would it be ok to drink if it would be considered more harmful not to?
And what about psychedelic drugs? Soma was probably a psychedelic drug, and I think it's safe to say that they can be used as a medicine to great effect.
What about Cannabis? No doubt that would have been used in the Buddha's time. Do we have any evidence that the Buddha knew about cannabis? If so, why was alcohol singled out?
Please note: This profile picture is not actually a picture of the user.