Thank you very much for your thoughtful reply. I appreciate you taking the time to answer.

Thank you very much for your thoughtful reply. I appreciate you taking the time to answer.
Not a problem. And just as something of a postscript to that answer, here's further indication that has since come out, that substantiates what I spoke of...
He doesn't like the FBI and CIA to spy on him, but does not mind if they spy on millions of average citizens.retrofuturist wrote: ↑Thu Mar 29, 2018 3:43 am Greetings Justsit,
Not a problem. And just as something of a postscript to that answer, here's further indication that has since come out, that substantiates what I spoke of...
Documents suggest possible coordination between CIA, FBI, Obama WH and Dem officials early in Trump-Russia probe: investigators
The Real Collusion Story (a long article, but excellent)
... and I predict much more coming to light over the course of the year. These select leaks are just a teaser to get people gradually accustomed to the full magnitude of the corruption. We saw the lengths Clinton went to in order to sabotage one of her own (i.e. Bernie Sanders) during the Democratic primaries... so it really shouldn't surprise anyone the lengths she and her co-conspirators would go to in order to sabotage an anti-establishment Republican who threatened to drain the swamp in Washington D.C.!
Anyway, the connection here relates to the enactment of the full Obama-Clinton 16 year plan as it pertained to guns and the 2nd amendment. If anyone wishes to discuss the various corruption probes in their own right, it's probably best we do it in another topic. Thanks.
Metta,
Paul.![]()
Most western democracies are able to protect themselves against "government tyranny" without mass gun ownership, so I find the first argument here entirely unconvincing. It's also an anachronism.retrofuturist wrote: ↑Tue Mar 27, 2018 10:35 pm I see two main arguments presented in favour of Americans keeping their guns.
- Protection (as a collective deterrent, and means to fight back) against government tyranny
- Personal protection against attackers
Dinsdale wrote: ↑Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:53 amMost western democracies are able to protect themselves against "government tyranny" without mass gun ownershipretrofuturist wrote: ↑Tue Mar 27, 2018 10:35 pm I see two main arguments presented in favour of Americans keeping their guns.
- Protection (as a collective deterrent, and means to fight back) against government tyranny
- Personal protection against attackers
Personally, I'm frightened of being shot...lyndon taylor wrote: ↑Thu Mar 29, 2018 12:00 pm Then why don't our Australian and English friends want to give up their free health insurance and move to USA??
There is no free health insurance here. If you wish to pay my monthly premium, and my Medicare levy etc., Lyndon, and make it free for me then be my guest.lyndon taylor wrote: ↑Thu Mar 29, 2018 12:00 pm Then why don't our Australian and English friends want to give up their free health insurance and move to USA??
Australia and the UK have free health insurance?lyndon taylor wrote: ↑Thu Mar 29, 2018 12:00 pm Then why don't our Australian and English friends want to give up their free health insurance and move to USA??
It's more that most western democracies are able to protect themselves against "government tyranny" by complying with this tyranny and promoting it, so that it doesn't look like tyranny at all.
Agreed. I printed it out and gave it a close read. I look forward to the day when the major players in the smear face justice. They've done a lot of harm to the nation.retrofuturist wrote: ↑Thu Mar 29, 2018 3:43 am
The Real Collusion Story (a long article, but excellent)
They wouldn't elect a clown like Trump.Pseudobabble wrote: ↑Thu Mar 29, 2018 10:38 amDinsdale wrote: ↑Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:53 amMost western democracies are able to protect themselves against "government tyranny" without mass gun ownershipretrofuturist wrote: ↑Tue Mar 27, 2018 10:35 pm I see two main arguments presented in favour of Americans keeping their guns.
- Protection (as a collective deterrent, and means to fight back) against government tyranny
- Personal protection against attackers
Evidence?