I imagine the primitiveness of the Burmese (who, for example, easily succumbed to foreign Marxism) has resulted in the maintenance of their primitive interpretation of religion; which can be contrasted with Thailand, where economic prosperity and modernity are beginning to have an impact on religious life in Thailand, a country that is 95 percent Buddhist but that in the last 30 years has seen the number of Buddhist monks decrease by about half. See video here: https://www.pbs.org/video/religion-and- ... -thailand/ . Thus, in Thailand, for example, the primitive interpretations of Buddhism are probably declining but the modern or true interpretations probably growing.Manopubbangama wrote: ↑Tue May 28, 2019 9:03 pmBuddhism in Burma is alive and well and this is the country that will carry the torch of the sasana for at least the next 100 years.
Qatar/GNI per capita
128,060 PPP dollars (2017)
United Arab Emirates/GNI per capita
74,410 PPP dollars (2017)
United States/GNI per capita
60,200 PPP dollars (2017)
Saudi Arabia/GNI per capita
54,770 PPP dollars (2017)
Australia/GNI per capita
45,780 PPP dollars (2017)
Poland/GNI per capita
28,170 PPP dollars (2017)
Thailand/GNI per capita
17,090 PPP dollars (2017)
Sri Lanka/GNI per capita
12,470 PPP dollars (2017)
Myanmar (Burma)/GNI per capita
5,830 PPP dollars (2017)
5,830/17,090 = 34%
MN 135 appears to say material wealth comes from good karma made in past lives. If so, it appears the average Burmese has made 34% or 1/3 of the good karma made by the average Thai in their past life.
I sense the above may be accurate. In Thailand, the common people appear to not understand Buddhism very well but the past maintenance of their traditional culture I sense was helped by the multitude of monks. In other words, the people were "carried" along by the monks but now monks are in decline. My impression of Theravada is monks view common people as "puthujjana" therefore view them as unsuitable for learning about Buddhism.
Yes. I sense this is true. In Australia, it appears many Asians convert to Christianity.
It seems Christianity & Islam are better designed for society because these religions believe god has a "plan" for creation or humanity.SarathW wrote: ↑Tue May 28, 2019 10:06 pmIf you compare this to Muslim men the go the mosque very often and do not consume alcohol. Due to this many Sri Lankan trust Muslims when they come to business dealings. Christians are highly active in the social area. They use education and health and the economic power to impress people.