SteRo wrote: ↑Sun Oct 18, 2020 5:20 pm
Why should an ego out of that snippet disappear?
I meant spiritual path demands that our ego takes a back seat. Which of the egos mentioned in the snippet should take a backseat?
This is such a basic question but really complicated to understand and answer.
Most of the Dhamma is about taming the ego but we don't even understand what we are taming.
You title reads "What does ego mean?" and I have responded to that question.
Nowhere in the theravada doctrine the term "ego" is used. If you have another path to compare with theravada which speaks of "our ego takes a back seat" then please specify that other path. Otherwise this thread is of no use.
SteRo wrote: ↑Sun Oct 18, 2020 5:20 pm
Why should an ego out of that snippet disappear?
I meant spiritual path demands that our ego takes a back seat. Which of the egos mentioned in the snippet should take a backseat?
This is such a basic question but really complicated to understand and answer.
Most of the Dhamma is about taming the ego but we don't even understand what we are taming.
You title reads "What does ego mean?" and I have responded to that question.
Nowhere in the theravada doctrine the term "ego" is used. If you have another path to compare with theravada which speaks of "our ego takes a back seat" then please specify that other path. Otherwise this thread is of no use.
My ego thought that most of Buddhism was about dissolving the ego.
Apparently it made a mistake.
But (in further research I found) other Buddhists must have asked it too.
No_Mind wrote:Why is the ego always identified with something bad .. and not good .. why is Salvador Dali an egotist but not Mother Teresa (imperfect analogy but I am sort of at a loss for words) .. didn't both of them act from ego?
Because in the case of evil unwholesome action, we can guarantee with 100% certainty that one's ego is always at play. But for good wholesome action? It's not a 100% certainty. Sure, it's possible that a person's intention behind his/her good deeds is "ego-based" (ie. build a good legacy so that his/her name will live forever in history, faith-based belief that one'd attain a better, more refined "ego" with God in heaven, etc.), but it might also very well be the case that that person simply acts out of raw pure loving-kindness, compassion, and from a Buddhist perspective, a concrete implementation of truly letting go of ego.
My query is if I make up my mind to wake up at 5 AM and meditate, to refuse alcohol, to refuse meat, .. why is that not ego? I could as well say I give up my ego .. and I surrender and drink as much as I want ..
Even wanting to be liberated .. or taking few steps in that direction .. browsing DW, listening to Dhamma Talks .. is that not ego too?
Why is the ego always identified with something bad .. and not good .. why is Salvador Dali an egotist but not Mother Teresa (imperfect analogy but I am sort of at a loss for words) .. didn't both of them act from ego?
Can anyone explain the meaning of ego? I am unable to understand one of the most basic terms of Dhamma/Dharma.
Note to mods - I am unsure if this is the right place to put this question but ego or self with small s has a place in Dhammic progress too. Lounge is closed so I did not know where to place this question.
It seems that all of my current problems can be traced back to my ego (it appears I have a lot of it). What is it and how does one get rid of it?
Everything is "ego" or self based. That is the starting position for every person. It is impossible for the self to be rid of itself! Understanding what this self is the first step to its cessation which is not exactly the same as getting rid of it which is ego or self based.
O house-builder, you are seen! You will not build this house again. For your rafters are broken and your ridgepole shattered. My mind has reached the Unconditioned; I have attained the destruction of craving.
Gahakāraka diṭṭho’si puna gehaṃ na kāhasi
Sabbā te phāsukā bhaggā gahakauṭaṃ visaṅkhitaṃ
Visaṅkhāragataṃ cittaṃ taṇhānaṃ khayamajjhagā.
– Dhammapada Verse 154
And what is right speech? Abstaining from lying, from divisive speech, from abusive speech, & from idle chatter: This is called right speech.
SarathW wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 2:32 am
What is the pali word for "ego"?
Attā.
What is the Uncreated?
Sublime & free, what is that obscured Eternity?
It is the Undying, the Bright, the Isle.
It is an Ocean, a Secret: Reality.
Both life and oblivion, it is Nirvāṇa.
Buddhatva. If you attain buddhatta, you will have an infallible 'superego' which is not your ātma. The way you're using "ego" here especially in the context of "superego" is not really a traditionally Buddhist way to use "ātma" and whatever "superego" would translate as. I suppose this is what the pot-stirring emoticon was for, a bit of levity. Buddhahood is accompanied by perfect morality, so you could use it for "superego." It's not very helpful for non-Buddhas, ordinary persons. "Bodhicitta" could translate "superego" in some senses, but then that's not Theravadin. Either way, the id-ego-superego schema is foreign to Buddhism and is I think of questionable utility within it.
What is the Uncreated?
Sublime & free, what is that obscured Eternity?
It is the Undying, the Bright, the Isle.
It is an Ocean, a Secret: Reality.
Both life and oblivion, it is Nirvāṇa.
No_Mind wrote: ↑Sun Oct 18, 2020 4:05 pm
It seems that all of my current problems can be traced back to my ego … What is it and how does one get rid of it?
No_Mind wrote: ↑Sun Oct 18, 2020 4:05 pmWhat does ego mean?
"Ego" is the politically correct word for when people want to criticize someone severely, or just flex their mental masturbatory muscles. Because, like, it's not all that spirishual to call someone a retard or an idiot.
No_Mind wrote: ↑Sun Oct 18, 2020 4:23 pmWhy does only frustration, anger .. etc get associated with "lot of ego" and not the rest ..
Because otherwise New Agers can't make money off of gullible, desperate souls.
Unless I understand what is ego and why it is ego how can I tame it?
You can fight fire with fire ... a bigger fire.
No_Mind wrote: ↑Sun Oct 18, 2020 5:27 pmWhich of the egos mentioned in the snippet should take a backseat?