https://rychappell.substack.com/p/do-yo ... -over-time
Though the author (Chappell) at the link above isn't Buddhist, I suspect that modern academic philosophy was influenced by Buddhism. I believe that the Buddha was the first or one of the first major "philosophers" to assert that the self isn't real. I don't necessarily agree with all of Chappell's assertions, but he raises some interesting questions.
"Parfit argues that we do not endure, or exist through time, in quite the way that we ordinarily suppose. "
Do you really exist over time?
Do you really exist over time?
May all beings, in or out of the womb, be well, happy and peaceful.
- cappuccino
- Posts: 12879
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 1:45 am
- Contact:
Re: Do you really exist over time?
Buddha is the one who asserted not self
Rather than self… no self
- cappuccino
- Posts: 12879
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 1:45 am
- Contact:
Re: Do you really exist over time?
People think of themselves as the same person
Same as ever…
Buddha taught we are completely different
Re: Do you really exist over time?
You say that as if you think it disagrees with what I said.cappuccino wrote: ↑Thu May 26, 2022 3:20 amBuddha is the one who asserted not self
Rather than self… no self
May all beings, in or out of the womb, be well, happy and peaceful.
- cappuccino
- Posts: 12879
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 1:45 am
- Contact:
Re: Do you really exist over time?
Saying the self does not exist is not Buddhism
Even though most Buddhists say so
Re: Do you really exist over time?
And did I say that it doesn't exist? No, I said it isn't real.cappuccino wrote: ↑Thu May 26, 2022 3:37 amSaying the self does not exist is not Buddhism
Even though most Buddhists say so
May all beings, in or out of the womb, be well, happy and peaceful.
- cappuccino
- Posts: 12879
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 1:45 am
- Contact:
Re: Do you really exist over time?
Things that are not real do not exist
Re: Do you really exist over time?
Did the Buddha ever split the hair that you are splitting?
May all beings, in or out of the womb, be well, happy and peaceful.
- cappuccino
- Posts: 12879
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 1:45 am
- Contact:
Re: Do you really exist over time?
Re: Do you really exist over time?
"being asked by Vacchagotta the wanderer if there is no self — were to answer that there is no self, that would be conforming with those brahmans & contemplatives who are exponents of annihilationism [the view that death is the annihilation of consciousness]"cappuccino wrote: ↑Thu May 26, 2022 3:42 am Yes…
Ananda Sutta: To Ananda
(On Self, No Self, and Not-self)
It's funny in a way, because the sentence is incorrect, or at least the parenthetical part. If death is the annihilation of self, then it presupposes a self. If there is (present tense) no self, then there cannot be annihilation of the self at death. The parenthetical part of Ven. Thanissaro's translation also seems to be equating consciousness with the self, and we know from many suttas that that is not the case.
May all beings, in or out of the womb, be well, happy and peaceful.
- cappuccino
- Posts: 12879
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 1:45 am
- Contact:
Re: Do you really exist over time?
Of course. The "you" that ages with time exists.
But that which changes cannot be what you truly are, can it?
Are you still a baby?
Nor are you the old person in the future.
Were you there at your birth?
If not, you cannot truly say that you were born on such and such a date.
The only truthful thing to say is "I was told that I was born on ..."
But that which changes cannot be what you truly are, can it?
Are you still a baby?
Nor are you the old person in the future.
Were you there at your birth?
If not, you cannot truly say that you were born on such and such a date.
The only truthful thing to say is "I was told that I was born on ..."
And what is right speech? Abstaining from lying, from divisive speech, from abusive speech, & from idle chatter: This is called right speech.
Re: Do you really exist over time?
No, that's not all. Whatever he was trying to imply, there is a logical error there.
May all beings, in or out of the womb, be well, happy and peaceful.
- cappuccino
- Posts: 12879
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 1:45 am
- Contact:
Re: Do you really exist over time?
Last edited by cappuccino on Thu May 26, 2022 12:36 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Do you really exist over time?
There is for paramattha dhammas:
Materiality
Cetasikas
Citta
Nibbana
Although Nibbana is permanent it is not our self. We can not say "my Nibbana" "his Nibbana" etc. It is not personal.
Nibbana is so subtile, profound and close that we dont see it, like we dont see a window glass while watching through. There is nothing "deeper" than Nibbana, so when the mind realises it, and understand its anatta, all fabricated phenomanes appear as gross and superficial, not me, not mine, not my self.
It is because of the very dept of Nibbana and of the very anatta of it that mind let go of all what is superficial and gross.
We can say that Nibbana is more close and intimate to "us" than 5 khandhas. So like a snake let go of old skin, mind let go of all what is gross, impermanent, unsatisfactory.
The way of Dhamma is the way from complications to simplicity. In order to find the ultimate simplicity we have to let go of all what is fabricated, composed, changing, unstable, unsatisfactory. For exemple if we experiance something and that we see its changing and pedendently arisen nature - we recognise is as not worthy of clinging, and go futher/deeper.
Imho
Materiality
Cetasikas
Citta
Nibbana
Although Nibbana is permanent it is not our self. We can not say "my Nibbana" "his Nibbana" etc. It is not personal.
Nibbana is so subtile, profound and close that we dont see it, like we dont see a window glass while watching through. There is nothing "deeper" than Nibbana, so when the mind realises it, and understand its anatta, all fabricated phenomanes appear as gross and superficial, not me, not mine, not my self.
It is because of the very dept of Nibbana and of the very anatta of it that mind let go of all what is superficial and gross.
We can say that Nibbana is more close and intimate to "us" than 5 khandhas. So like a snake let go of old skin, mind let go of all what is gross, impermanent, unsatisfactory.
The way of Dhamma is the way from complications to simplicity. In order to find the ultimate simplicity we have to let go of all what is fabricated, composed, changing, unstable, unsatisfactory. For exemple if we experiance something and that we see its changing and pedendently arisen nature - we recognise is as not worthy of clinging, and go futher/deeper.
Imho
We don't live Samsara, Samsara is living us...
"Form, feelings, perceptions, formations, consciousness - don't care about us, we don't exist for them"
"Form, feelings, perceptions, formations, consciousness - don't care about us, we don't exist for them"