Any statistics to back that up?
Actually, I know you can't produce reliable statistics, because data on adverse effects has been suppressed. But perhaps we'll get to see it as the FDA gradually release it.
Any statistics to back that up?
Definitely not true.
It says: "Unfortunately, some commentators talked about that ratio as if it was all a real benefit of vaccination. It wasn’t."mikenz66 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 04, 2022 7:33 amThe death rate for nonvaccinnated is higher than for vaccinated. See, for example:
https://theconversation.com/most-covid- ... its-179648
Would that include you?Eharp wrote: ↑Tue Jul 05, 2022 12:59 am I doubt anyone here, unless they have advanced degrees and experience in immunology, have the background or understanding to parse any "statistics" and what they mean. Incredible amounts of misinformation, "experts" with their own agendas, and straight up lies have created a thicket of views.
maybe it was partly the reason… for being in the hospitalKathyLauren wrote: ↑Mon Jul 04, 2022 11:27 pm I was in hospital for three weeks
Knowing how bad it was with the protection of vaccines, I might have died without them.
That's a fair question. Since the vaccines were designed to artificially and specifically fixate the body's attention on the (now redundant) original version of COVID-19, it could have come at the expense of the body's natural ability to respond generally to all viral infections, including subsequent variants. Or so one theory goes...cappuccino wrote: ↑Tue Jul 05, 2022 2:43 ammaybe it was partly the reason… for being in the hospitalKathyLauren wrote: ↑Mon Jul 04, 2022 11:27 pm I was in hospital for three weeks
Knowing how bad it was with the protection of vaccines, I might have died without them.
I followed our local stats (Switzerland) both in regards to vaccine side effects and hospitalisations until mid last year. These vaccines (mRNA) are pretty heavy compared to the traditional vaccines, i.e. show a significantly higher rate of serious side effects. But they are also very effective against the risk of hospitalisation. Our hospital cohort has largely been the un-vaxxed, even though the majority (especially the elderly) are vaxxed, so if the vaccine was ineffective, you'd expect many more vaxxed people in the hospital than unvaxxed, but it's been the opposite.
Can I respectfully ask what qualifies you to give medical advice?retrofuturist wrote: ↑Tue Jul 05, 2022 2:57 am
Perhaps it's best to get off the booster train, let your last dose be your last, and allow the distortive effects of the vaccine to (hopefully) wane.
Metta,
Paul.
Is it, though? Or is it unfounded speculation?retrofuturist wrote: ↑Tue Jul 05, 2022 2:57 am Greetings,
That's a fair question.cappuccino wrote: ↑Tue Jul 05, 2022 2:43 ammaybe it was partly the reason… for being in the hospitalKathyLauren wrote: ↑Mon Jul 04, 2022 11:27 pm I was in hospital for three weeks
Knowing how bad it was with the protection of vaccines, I might have died without them.
The variants have a lot in common, so not redundant. And that the vaccine interferes, rather than enhance the body's ability to fight the infection is something that needs to be backed up. Otherwise it's just more speculation.retrofuturist wrote: ↑Tue Jul 05, 2022 2:57 am Since the vaccines were designed to artificially and specifically fixate the body's attention on the (now redundant) original version of COVID-19, it could have come at the expense of the body's natural ability to respond generally to all viral infections, including subsequent variants. Or so one theory goes...
Sounds like you've made your mind up about the vaccine, but based on what?retrofuturist wrote: ↑Tue Jul 05, 2022 2:57 am Perhaps it's best to get off the booster train, let your last dose be your last, and allow the distortive effects of the vaccine to (hopefully) wane.
I'm not claiming to have any qualifications.
Of course it is. What do you think an hypothesis is?
Thanks for sharing your experiments at mind-reading with us.
you can't understand: this vaccine is dangerous