Pronouncing "v"

Explore the ancient language of the Tipitaka and Theravāda commentaries
Post Reply
Lombardi4
Posts: 1551
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 2:53 pm

Pronouncing "v"

Post by Lombardi4 »

Why do some people pronounce "vipassana" as [wipassana], "bhagavato" as [bhagawato], "avijja" as [awijja], etc...?
Which is the correct pronunciation of "v" — [v] or [w]?
Or if both are correct, is it then a regional difference, i.e. Sri Lankans pronouncing it as [v] while Thais as [w]?

Thanks!
User avatar
Kare
Posts: 767
Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 10:58 am
Location: Norway
Contact:

Re: Pronouncing "v"

Post by Kare »

Stefan wrote:Why do some people pronounce "vipassana" as [wipassana], "bhagavato" as [bhagawato], "avijja" as [awijja], etc...?
Which is the correct pronunciation of "v" — [v] or [w]?
Or if both are correct, is it then a regional difference, i.e. Sri Lankans pronouncing it as [v] while Thais as [w]?

Thanks!
The correct pronunciation is probably the labio-dental [v] (although it has been discussed - according to Warder some think that the old pronunciation in the days when Pali was a spoken language, may have been the bilabial [w]). In the Thai language there is no [v]. The letter in the Thai alphabet that stands for the [v] in the Pali words, is pronounced as [w]. So the [w]-pronunciation heard today is probably influenced by the Thai.
Mettāya,
Kåre
Lombardi4
Posts: 1551
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 2:53 pm

Re: Pronouncing "v"

Post by Lombardi4 »

Thank you, Kåre!
User avatar
mikenz66
Posts: 19773
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 7:37 am
Location: Aotearoa, New Zealand

Re: Pronouncing "v"

Post by mikenz66 »

Thai simply doesn't have a "v" sound, just as English doesn't have a number of sounds found in languages such as Thai, the various Chinese dialects, and even European languages such as Dutch (e.g. Van Gogh). Therefore, you don't find Thai pronouncing it as "v", just as you don't find many English speakers pronouncing Van Gogh correctly (it makes me feel like I'm making a rude noise!).

In my opinion, the "right" pronunciation is the pronunciation of the group one is chanting with. It would be silly to turn up to to a Thai Wat and create dissonance by loudly chanting a different pronunciation...

:anjali:
Mike
User avatar
retrofuturist
Posts: 27255
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Pronouncing "v"

Post by retrofuturist »

Greetings,

From what I can gather the "v" isn't particularly common amongst Sri Lankans either... it's pronounced like more of a "w".

So much so that when writing certain Dhamma related words in English / Roman Script, they may even replace the "v" with a "w"!

Metta,
Retro. :)
"The uprooting of identity is seen by the noble ones as pleasurable; but this contradicts what the whole world sees" (Snp 3.12)

"Overcome the liar by truth" (Dhp 223)
User avatar
ancientbuddhism
Posts: 887
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 12:53 pm
Location: Cyberia

Re: Pronouncing "v"

Post by ancientbuddhism »

In the Tahi, true ‘v’ is replaced with . Also, the Thai rigor of pāḷi chanting insists on their particular ephony of retroflex consonents such as ṭ & ṇ, of which is rather hard to render any transliteration.

When I was chanting with the Lao saṅgha it was difficult to follow after training with the Thai, as they chant pāḷi according to the custom of Lao language. Lao does not use ‘r’ or ‘ch’ giving brahmacariya the euphony boomasara.

And as retro has mentioned, the Sri Lanka saṅgha does not seem to care. Although a Sri Lankan abbot I stayed with mentioned that there were some variations in the pāḷi texts where the 'v' is found replaced by 'b'.
I say, beware of all enterprises that require new clothes, and not rather a new wearer of clothes.” – Henry David Thoreau, Walden, 1854

Secure your own mask before assisting others. – NORTHWEST AIRLINES (Pre-Flight Instruction)

A Handful of Leaves
User avatar
Gwi II
Posts: 466
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2023 10:49 am
Location: Indonesia 🇮🇩
Contact:

Re: Pronouncing "v"

Post by Gwi II »

Lombardi4 wrote: Tue Mar 01, 2011 4:34 pm Why do some people pronounce "vipassana" as [wipassana], "bhagavato" as [bhagawato], "avijja" as [awijja], etc...?
Which is the correct pronunciation of "v" — [v] or [w]?
Or if both are correct, is it then a regional difference, i.e. Sri Lankans pronouncing it as [v] while Thais as [w]?

Thanks!
It is "w" in Pāḷi, but the sound is
between "v" and "w"
. Same as "v" in
Spanish, which is similar to "b": veinte
(read: beinte). Or same as Javanese
(write: Java [language]; read: Jowo).

That's why I will popularize this: Ṽ/ṽ


Buddha (read: Bu-ddho)
・ "a" becomes "o" = masculine.
Same as chica and chico (in Spanish).


That's why I will popularize this: å
・(only changes in the middle and (majority) in
the back. So, there is no form of capital. Only a
few percent are non-inflections, such as "tato"
(not "tata/tatå"); ṭhānaso (not ṭhānasa/ṭhānaså).


Buddho, Dhammo, Sanggho (recommended)
Buddha, Dhamma, Sanggha (no problem)
:anjali:
Gwi: "There are only-two Sakaṽādins:
Theraṽādå&Ṽibhajjaṽādå, the rest are
nonsakaṽādins!"
User avatar
Sam Vara
Site Admin
Posts: 12862
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 5:42 pm
Location: Portsmouth, U.K.

Re: Pronouncing "v"

Post by Sam Vara »

Gwi II wrote: Sun Nov 19, 2023 3:46 am
Buddho, Dhammo, Sanggho (recommended)
Only in the nominative singulo for this typo of nouno. Otherwise, plaino wrongo.
User avatar
Gwi II
Posts: 466
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2023 10:49 am
Location: Indonesia 🇮🇩
Contact:

Re: Pronouncing "v"

Post by Gwi II »

Sam Vara wrote: Sun Nov 19, 2023 8:13 am
Gwi II wrote: Sun Nov 19, 2023 3:46 am
Buddho, Dhammo, Sanggho (recommended)
Only in the nominative singulo for this typo of nouno. Otherwise, plaino wrongo.
I know, there are also cases like this:

Buddho Gotama/Gotama Buddho (most correct)
Buddho Gotamo (wrong)
Gotama Buddha (don't know the changes)
Gotamo Buddha (wrong)


Samaṇo Gotamo (correct)
Samaṇa Gotama (don't know the changes)

:anjali:
Gwi: "There are only-two Sakaṽādins:
Theraṽādå&Ṽibhajjaṽādå, the rest are
nonsakaṽādins!"
Post Reply