Not invited taking leave here: What does one think? Guessing that not having seeked to forward the message on Dhamma in an meta-area as an alternative, if thinking worthy to keep deluded areas undisturbed deluded, by censure.
Is is good, skilful, to take aways what is given to else on, hidding up, and "protect"/deprive one from good advices? Or is such merely conducted by defilments, holding on group-view, doubt and use useless conducts, e.g. judged by lower fetters, not save from heading downwardly?
Maybe there are some wishing to give good advices, suggest how to aviod real dangers for oneself and many by going after basics first. May it be a welcome area for such.
Wise and helpful, compassionate, if hindering one to get hinted on dangers?
Wise and helpful, compassionate, if hindering one to get hinted on dangers?
You may make use of this account as wished for good, it's a cast off one. Password: 12345678. As the good stuff gets usually censured here, good if being quick to find ways out.
Re: Wise and helpful, compassionate, if hindering one to get hinted on dangers?
Your avant-garde use of the English language leaves much of what you say open to interpretation.
“Life is swept along, short is the life span; no shelters exist for one who has reached old age. Seeing clearly this danger in death, a seeker of peace should drop the world’s bait.” SN 1.3
Re: Wise and helpful, compassionate, if hindering one to get hinted on dangers?
Good if possible to take on for reflection in various ways, where ever might be an opening, good householder, and generous if sharing found tracks toward release by it, or at least simply leave having found ways for improve used to patterns.
You may make use of this account as wished for good, it's a cast off one. Password: 12345678. As the good stuff gets usually censured here, good if being quick to find ways out.
Re: Wise and helpful, compassionate, if hindering one to get hinted on dangers?
Yours here.
Again, also in relation with a very needed monastic section, to do not lead (even intentionally) Venerables into disgrace: it's more then often the case, that moderators, biased, to censure warnings for Venerables to conduct not wrong.
Sure, there are many communities, who just like to feed on failures of others, instead of keeping there Gems high and do their duties proper toward them, which incl. to hold them on good track.
Again, also in relation with a very needed monastic section, to do not lead (even intentionally) Venerables into disgrace: it's more then often the case, that moderators, biased, to censure warnings for Venerables to conduct not wrong.
Sure, there are many communities, who just like to feed on failures of others, instead of keeping there Gems high and do their duties proper toward them, which incl. to hold them on good track.