thepea wrote: ↑Tue Jul 26, 2022 1:16 am
Johann wrote: ↑Tue Jul 26, 2022 12:54 am
thepea wrote: ↑Tue Jul 26, 2022 12:28 am
I disagree.
Yes, and that's simply the opposite of Saddha, and here he stucks, with on way for release. One can just leave good householder at hire of his action run on. Or as the Buddha similar draw a sample: let those not willing to go forth die off within relation.
I have faith in avoiding destruction of life.
If so, good householder, why then instead of abstaining and no more taking part, holding on house, defending stand and stay bond to cause suffering for both, onesf and others?
Sacca is something fundamental important. Lack of sacca and blind to suffering, one nothing but follows non-benefical rites and hypocritical views to defend one's not willing to let go, surrender, saddha.
Aside of faith in deeds have effects, and that one is heir of one's actions, it of course also requires firm faith that escape is possible.
Fools will ever on nourish on each other, hurt again and again, delight in sensuality, while those with faith, simply stopping are bond to arrive at deathless.
This Sasana does not serve with any deluded ideas of perfect worlds, but points out the way to gain debtlessness, to escape. "Heros" always just kill for their sake, others or themselves... for another same-same turn.