What
Eye vinnana, sota vinnana is NOT vipaka vinnana. Someone is truly confused.
Eye vinnana, sota, ..., Mano are just the 6 Vinnana. The 5 recourse to mano vinnana.
Please don't misrepresent Buddha words with you impure explanation.
A puthujjana with blind eye can't even fully grasp the meaning of it.
Those Paticcasamuppada will be understood with same analysis as SN 12.2 and the rest of sutta with fully developed N8FP.
You can't separate the 12 links, they are all connected. But you need to stop each section with the N8FP. Step by step.
But once you have the full knowledge the whole DO stop to function. Mind is free with wisdom or free both way.
O one more thing, the breathing will stop when one has become an arahant (truly fascinating for ending of dukkha). Mind always in samadhi.
This is what i call explaning high teaching with lower teaching (impure thinking).you wrote: - 'Kamma vinnana" you ACCUMULATE by engaging in abhisankhara ("avijja paccaya sankhara"). P.S. That is the same as doing kamma and making causes for rebirths.
- One of those kamma vinnana (the strongest) becomes patisandhi vinnana at the moment of grasping a new existence (bhava).
Completely miss the Buddha teaching (complete, precise and pure).
Please ask your self:
- have you seen/known the alive (not death) ariya personally?
- have you heard true dhamma from him personally?
- have you perfected the ariyan precepts?
- have you perfected sense restraints?
- have you perfected sati/samadhi?
If you have none of the above, just give up your explanation. It is waste of time. Your mind is still full of asava(s) or defilements. Can't fully understand the whole teaching yet.
Contact occurs when you interact with environment through your senses. When these happen the feeling/perceptions internally arise. One needs to stop/still/transcend the vedana and sanna to be freed. This is where samma sati/samadhi/vayama come to play.you wrote: I am asking you to explain "contact" in the same way, in your own words.
Kamma and vipaka is lower Teaching as Buddha said in MN 117.
MN 117 wrote:what is right view that is accompanied by defilements, has the attributes of good deeds, and ripens in attachment? ‘There is meaning in giving, sacrifice, and offerings. There are fruits and results (vipaka) of good and bad deeds (kusala & akusala kamma). There is an afterlife. There are such things as mother and father, and beings that are reborn spontaneously. And there are ascetics and brahmins who are well attained and practiced, and who describe the afterlife after realizing it with their own insight.’ This is right view that is accompanied by defilements, has the attributes of good deeds, and ripens in attachment.
what is right view that is noble, undefiled, transcendent, a factor of the path? It’s the wisdom—the faculty of wisdom, the power of wisdom, the awakening factor of investigation of principles, and right view as a factor of the path—in one of noble mind and undefiled mind, who possesses the noble path and develops the noble path. This is called right view that is noble, undefiled, transcendent, a factor of the path.
This is also wrong statement. Those 12 links always follow from Avijja. Vinnana in DO is not about rebirth. Completely miss the point.you wrote:P.S. It should be translated as "with the ceasing of ignorance, rebirth-consciousness (patisandhi vinnana) ceases"
When one has become arahant, they check the whole 12 links, not just the vinnana. One can't separate the 12.
When mind is completely still and not reaction to any conditionals and with fully developed N8FP, then one knows they are free.
If vinnana in DO is about rebirth, then there is no way an arahant with wisdom can be freed from birth, old age, sick and death before death of Body.
Based on his argument, then it is completely not possible to live and achieve holy life in this very life. BUT Buddha say it is possible to achieve all that when one is still alive And No need to wait for death.
His explanation is completely the opposite of the teaching.
One more thing, don't mix the past, present, future in DO. It can be confusing. This is why one needs to still/transcend the mind (samma samadhi) to understand.
If one used the regular human mind (impure, full of asavas), there is no way to understand.